Googology Wiki
Googology Wiki

Hi testitem! Moooosey (talk) 11:02, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

Hi Testitemqlstudop, if you want to know more about googology, then you should browse various googology sites, particularly this site, or watch Youtube videos about big numbers. You should learn how to analyze notations, and user pages are a good spot to look for those. If you read these pages carefully, you might learn a lot about OCFs, but the OCF commonly used is the "Normal" OCF or UNOCF, which are ill-defined. (P-bot is particularly picky about ill-definedness, so watch out.) Read Hyp cos's page, or preferably my page, to learn about the well-defined OCF. 12AbBa (talk) 14:32, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

Well, the issue is not only that you are based on ill-defined objects, but also that you are writing mathematically wrong arguments... I strongly recommend you to only write what you actually know. Then you will soon improve yourself very well, because you already have experiences on analysis.
p-adic 14:50, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

Weird confusion between Profile and talk page

You should move the stuff that @forthright put on your profile page on your talk page.

"hi!! is your aka name this?

no it's just an entry in the census"

o k!! 😁😁😁😁 Forthright (talk) 00:55, October 22, 2019 (UTC)

Before Editting Articles

Please check sources before editting articles. If you do not have sources, then adding uncertain information is not suitable even if you put the clarification of "Citation Needed". At least, you can see that the contents which you added are wrong by reading the corresponding articles. For example, the FGH at \(\omega_1^{\textrm{CK}}\) heavily depends on the choice of fundamental sequences, and no system of fundamental sequences approximately corresponding to busy beaver function has been discovered in mathematics. It can be smaller than the FGH at \(\varepsilon_0\) (computable!) if you choose a specific system of fundamental sequences, and might be greater than higher order busy beaver functions if you choose a canonical one. It is still open. Anyway, thank you for the trial to improve the article.

p-adic 01:37, October 22, 2019 (UTC)

Also, could you please create an article of a category, before you add many articles to it? It is difficult to guess what articles should be included into the category which you created without any description. Since categories are in the main space, which is not your personal playground, please share your intension with others. For example, the following are categories which you created without any descriptions:
I added a description to the last category since you have not. Please try a similar description.
p-adic 00:56, October 24, 2019 (UTC)