(Blog post created or updated.) |
(Blog post created or updated.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
2) There will be a voting system for each work so that only high-quality works will be added to the mainspace. |
2) There will be a voting system for each work so that only high-quality works will be added to the mainspace. |
||
| + | |||
| + | 3) Alternatively, we create a panel of trusted members, and that they will make the final decisions about what can be added to the mainspace. |
||
[[Category:Blog posts]] |
[[Category:Blog posts]] |
||
Revision as of 05:21, 17 January 2020
Hi.
I see that many interesting googological stuff appear in blog posts and user pages, but it may not be added to mainspace because of citation policy. I propose to soften the rule so that we shouldn't add only low-quality content to mainspace. Newcomers can learn many things from googology buried only in blog posts and user pages. Also, it is confusing, that we don't have the largest valid googologism (which I suppose is \(f^{10}(10 \uparrow^{10} 10)\), but it is hard to verify it) in the mainspace for now only because it is in blog post.
In addition, it gives a motivation to write good blog posts here so that they will be added to articles.
I'm not sure how precisely new rules would sound, but let's discuss it here.
What we have at 16.01.2020
Here is a summary.
1) Only blog posts should be included as a good source because they can be edited only by a single person or by an admin, and history keeps.
2) There will be a voting system for each work so that only high-quality works will be added to the mainspace.
3) Alternatively, we create a panel of trusted members, and that they will make the final decisions about what can be added to the mainspace.