FANDOM


(Blog post created or updated.)
(Blog post created or updated.)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Here is a summary.
 
Here is a summary.
   
1) Only blog posts should be included as a good source because it can be edited only by a single person or by an admin, and history keeps.
+
1) Only blog posts should be included as a good source because they can be edited only by a single person or by an admin, and history keeps.
   
 
2) There will be a voting system for each work so that only high-quality works will be added to the mainspace.
 
2) There will be a voting system for each work so that only high-quality works will be added to the mainspace.

Revision as of 07:16, January 16, 2020

Hi.

I see that many interesting googological stuff appear in blog posts and user pages, but it may not be added to mainspace because of citation policy. I propose to soften the rule so that we shouldn't add only low-quality content to mainspace. Newcomers can learn many things from googology buried only in blog posts and user pages. Also, it is confusing, that we don't have the largest valid googologism (which I suppose is \(f^{10}(10 \uparrow^{10} 10)\), but it is hard to verify it) in the mainspace for now only because it is in blog post.

I'm not sure how precisely new rules would sound, but let's discuss it here.

What we have at 16.01.2020

Here is a summary.

1) Only blog posts should be included as a good source because they can be edited only by a single person or by an admin, and history keeps.

2) There will be a voting system for each work so that only high-quality works will be added to the mainspace.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.