I am by no means an expert on ordinals and cardinals, but I've noted the ITTM sizes to be \lambda=\gamma<\zeta<\Sigma. Shouldn't the four ITTMs therefore be listed as \lambda,\gamma,\zeta,\Sigma? (It's nitpicky, but I thought that would just make things clearer.)QuasarBooster (talk) 18:31, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
It seems to me that it would be more useful to create a separate ordinals navbox and embed it in the set theory navbox, as ordinals are much more useful to googologists, and it would help justify adding more relevant things like Ordinal Hierarchies.
The main reason to me is that only four of the thirty-odd links aren't related to ordinals, and it seems silly to have them all under the banner Set theory when Ordinals is a much better choice.~εmli 09:52, June 10, 2016 (UTC)
Should we delete "See also" section before the template? If so, I will delete it in other articles. I put the section because I saw it in other articles. If nobody has an opinion, I keep the section.
p-adic 22:37, March 8, 2020 (UTC)