DO NOT REMOVE correct and sourced innformation
@the creator
STOP removing correct and sourced information. Also, stop adding unsourced information, e.g. the growth rate and the restriction of the rules. If you want to remove something wrong, explain the incorrectness at the talk page. STOP REMOVING correct and sourced information.
p-adic 23:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
@the creator
I will revert all the dishonest removement ignoring the talk page. Explain why we should remove the correct and sourced information.
p-adic 00:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
EDIT: I note that your website cannot be a source of the growth rate. It can just be a source of the intended growth rate. For example, even if you write "The growth rate is ω^2 in FGH" in the "source", it does not directly imply that the growth rate is ω^2 in FGH. Remember that your website is not peer-reviewed, and hence is unreliable. Your website can be a source of the information like "Who created the system", "how strong the system is intended to be", and so on. Indeed, your analysis is incorrect, because you insisted that the growth rate was ω^2 in FGH although it was ill-defined.
Anyway, I told you to learn what a source means. Do you understand that you are adding unsourced information now? Also, I repeat to say "DO NOT REMOVE correct and sourced information. JUST ADD new information." If you have any good reason to remove correct and sourced information, then explain it at the talk page. How many times should I tell this?
p-adic 01:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
@the creator
STOP REMOVING it. If you just add new information, why on earth will the number of letters be reduced? You silently removed the original rules without putting reasons. USE THE TALK PAGE. Seriously, stop ignoring all the issues in such a dishonest way.
p-adic 03:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)