It looks like this number is not in the source given, can someone find a source of this number? If not, can someone put the {{No source}} template? ARsygo (talk) 23:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
I think articles about certain well-known prefixes applied to small numbers (10 or less) should be allowed without a source. -- ☁ I wantmoreclouds! ⛅ 18:23, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Without a valid source, we cannot prove this number itself is valid, we could not know if the text given in the article is correct without a valid source, therefore it could be misleading. DRC 21:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
I've thought about making a source for numbers like this one just to put what everyone sees on here into writing, but I don't know if it'll count as the "first" source if it's booga- applied to a common number C7X (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Googology Wiki