I think it will be better if we have all Denis FGH googologisms in one page, not separated into multiple series. If we create regiment pages for each series there will be lots of them with about 20 numbers each. Rpakr (talk) 22:49, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
- Yes one page with 500+ numbers is admissible and probably better than 30 pages with 17-18 numbers, but FGH-numbers (excluding numbers of alpha series) require links to systems of fundamental sequences which were used for their definition. For example, series 2.1-2.4 were defined using fast-growing hierarchy with fundamental sequences for Wainer hierarchy, series 3.1.1-8.1 were defined using fundamental sequences for finitary Veblen function and so on (most of FS-systems defined on my site I also collected in the list of systems of fundamental sequences). I think series or groups of series although on one page nonetheless require separeted tables.--Denis Maksudov (talk) 23:15, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
- One page with separated sections and tables for each series or FS system used might be a good idea. Also we can also write about the naming system on that page.Rpakr (talk) 05:20, January 9, 2018 (UTC)