Track the most recent social changes to the community on this page.
Filters
5 August 2021
-
17:334D4850 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "The largest well-defined non-paradoxical number." Five words. Well-defined by definition. Non-parad... on the article Literally Legendary/Number related to Berry's Paradox: {{{{{}},{}},{{}},{}},{{{}},{}},{{}},{}} 0 words Well-defined (Equal to four) Non-parodoxical Also jo... (view)
-
12:34ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Or... 10^10^2000 = Guppyplexitoll in my extended Sbiis naming system. on the article Nayuta Ito/Lynz got over 10^10^2000: I guess, when will it pass 10^10^2500? (view)
-
12:31ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:AarexWikia04/An new new aarexnumbers!: Thankfully, the new Sites is still there, instead of going away as well. (view)
-
11:12Hexirp (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I said "C7X should have voided the warnings". I do not use a pronoun "it" for a person. For "p-shin-... on the article Hexirp/(2021-08-05) opinions: > I said "C7X should have voided the warnings". I do not use a pronoun "it" for a person. This is a ... (view)
-
07:51Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-08-05) opinions: I said "C7X should have voided the warnings". I do not use a pronoun "it" for a person. For "p-shin-... (view)
-
07:43Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-08-05) opinions: I said "C7X should have voided the warnings". I do not use a pronoun "it" for a person. For "p-shin-... (view)
-
05:28ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Meanwhile in the Aarex's Googology World... on the article 841 Avenue/Funny Googology Jokes on Youtube: Spoiler: Only works with numbers and small letters. As Marlett doesn't have a space for capital lett... (view)
-
05:22P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-08-05) opinions: (In order to avoid further tone-policing by Cloudy and C7X, I wrote a Japanese comment together with... (view)
-
00:51P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Number related to Berry's Paradox: "The largest well-defined non-paradoxical number." Five words. Well-defined by definition. Non-parad... (view)
4 August 2021
-
22:55Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment LittlePeng's post just explains the domain of higher order set theories, but not either the syntax o... on the article Literally Legendary/Ideas for symbols to make set theory stronger: Thanks for your feedback. (view)
-
14:18P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I don't like the situation in which people divide two side and ask which is wrong, and ask which sid... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: @Koteitan ありがとうございます。僕も現状の進行に同じく不満があります。... (view)
-
14:12Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I don't like the situation in which people divide two side and ask which is wrong, and ask which sid... (view)
-
14:12Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I don't like the situation in which people divide two side and ask which is wrong, and ask which sid... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: Hexirp always seems to want to judge them issue by issue. I think it better way a little bit. (view)
-
14:09Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I don't like the situation in which people divide two side and ask which is wrong, and ask which sid... (view)
-
14:08Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I don't like the situation in which people divide two side and ask which is wrong, and ask which sid... (view)
-
14:03Koteitan (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I don't like the situation in which people divide two side and ask which is wrong, and ask which sid... (view)
-
12:46P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Here is a source for "PTO(Π_1^1-TR0)=ψ0(Φ(1,0))" using an OCF defined by Rathjen, which is a diff... on the article P進大好きbot/Full References of Arguments on Ordinal Notations with Large Cardinals: Thank you. I think that it is not a reliable source of the equality, because Rathjen just listed res... (view)
-
12:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Here is a source for "PTO(Π_1^1-TR0)=ψ0(Φ(1,0))" using an OCF defined by Rathjen, which is a diff... on the article P進大好きbot/Full References of Arguments on Ordinal Notations with Large Cardinals: Thank you. I think that it is not a reliable source of the equality, because Rathjen just listed res... (view)
-
12:41P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Here is a source for "PTO(Π_1^1-TR0)=ψ0(Φ(1,0))" using an OCF defined by Rathjen, which is a diff... on the article P進大好きbot/Full References of Arguments on Ordinal Notations with Large Cardinals: I think that it is not a reliable source of the equality, because Rathjen just listed results which ... (view)
-
12:27ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Let's do this. on the article Username5243/A random bit of trivia: I guess, the WAM score removed when it got migrated to the UCP, right? (view)
-
11:34C7X (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Full References of Arguments on Ordinal Notations with Large Cardinals: Here is a source for "PTO(Π_1^1-TR0)=ψ0(Φ(1,0))" using an OCF defined by Rathjen, which is a diff... (view)
-
09:57Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Let's do this. on the article Username5243/A random bit of trivia: It seems to have started in 2013 https://community.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:BertH/Introducing_WAM a... (view)
-
04:54MultiSoul (talk | contribs) replied to the comment So, endingixul, is larger than BIGG, right? on the article MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: Im not sure if its bigger than Laurence Hollom's larges number, BIGG. (view)
-
04:24P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "B is toxic and judgemental." B "Were you talking to yourself?" A was getting frustrated. ---- I'd... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: ... (view)
-
03:47Koteitan (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: A "B is toxic and judgemental." B "Were you talking to yourself?" A was getting frustrated. ---- I'd... (view)
-
01:51ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Meanwhile in the Aarex's Googology World... on the article 841 Avenue/Funny Googology Jokes on Youtube: How about Marlett? It's also consists of symbols as well. (view)
-
01:33ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Let's do this. on the article Username5243/A random bit of trivia: Does the WAM score still active? (view)
3 August 2021
-
22:21P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I gave two attentions to p-shin-daisuki-bot. p-shin-daisuki-bot has accepted them. Do you think that... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: ... (view)
-
22:19P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I gave two attentions to p-shin-daisuki-bot. p-shin-daisuki-bot has accepted them. Do you think that... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: ... (view)
-
22:02P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Ideas for symbols to make set theory stronger: LittlePeng's post just explains the domain of higher order set theories, but not either the syntax o... (view)
-
17:46Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Good. But there are several problems. A "computable number" can have a short defining formula which ... on the article Literally Legendary/Computable numbers vs uncomputable numbers: Thanks for your thoughts (view)
-
15:42Hexirp (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I gave two attentions to p-shin-daisuki-bot. p-shin-daisuki-bot has accepted them. Do you think that... (view)
-
15:41Hexirp (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I gave two attentions to p-shin-daisuki-bot. p-shin-daisuki-bot has accepted them. Do you think that... (view)
-
12:25P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: ... (view)
-
09:10Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: @C7X You said "I do not think just an apology and/or deletion is sufficient, since for example just ... (view)
-
09:08Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: @C7X You said "I do not think just an apology and/or deletion is sufficient, since for example just ... (view)
-
05:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: I appreciate if you use the numbering above, in order to make discussion clearer. (Since I need to r... (view)
-
05:03P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: @Kyodaisuu @Hexirp @ARsygo In order to avoid further tone policing, I write a Japanese comment toget... (view)
-
03:57P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: In order to make the discussion easier for others to follow, I summarise my points: Estimation of ab... (view)
-
03:37P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: In order to make the discussion easier for others to follow, I summarise my points: Estimation of ab... (view)
-
02:55ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: To me, that's quite awkward, that we hadn't resolve the problem yet, we need to solve the debate as ... (view)
-
00:26P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Msiajoe74/Extended Veblen Function: > We use @ to indicate the number of 0's in SVO > We then use @@ to indicate the ω-th term in LVO s... (view)
-
00:14P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: @Kyodaisuu @Hexirp @ARsygo In order to avoid further tone policing, I write a Japanese comment toget... (view)
2 August 2021
-
23:58P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: > AFAIK, the out-of-context quotes have not been addressed. What do you mean? What are "the out-of-c... (view)
-
23:16P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: > AFAIK, the out-of-context quotes have not been addressed. What do you mean? What are "the out-of-c... (view)
-
19:07C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: @ARsygo As a part of the admin team, if the act of intentionally false evidence creation is ever unc... (view)
-
19:04C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... on the article C7X/Recent events 2: > I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not t... (view)
-
18:27
-
16:27Cloudy176 (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Rgetar/Two types of ordering, fundamental sequences beyond ε₀, new version of Ordinal Explorer: I found an infinite descending sequence on the new version. Single expand c 5 times, then expand the... (view)
-
16:26Cloudy176 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Rgetar/Two types of ordering, fundamental sequences beyond ε₀, new version of Ordinal Explorer: I found an infinite descending sequence on the new version. Single expand c 5 times, then expand the... (view)
-
10:12MultiSoul (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Noogai93/Hyperfactorial numbers: What a beauty (view)
-
09:32ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Nayuta Ito/Article explosion happened!: Let me expand the article to add approximations. (view)
-
09:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Eze Bar YT/illions by : BSSJ5: Nivimicrillion is novimicrillion, right? (view)
-
05:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Fast-growing hierarchy? I mean, it's based on recursion and addition. on the article Tetramur/Big functions: Perhaps the OP is very roughly approximating the base f_0 with exponential, because there are not so... (view)
-
02:13Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Fast-growing hierarchy? I mean, it's based on recursion and addition. on the article Tetramur/Big functions: It is approximately, i think, not on exponential. f_2(n) is f_1^n(n), which in turn is based on f_0,... (view)
-
02:05ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Dhacorrea/Gogopyr: Can I add this into my not truetest? (view)
-
00:5312AbBa (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hyp cos/TON, stable ordinals, and my array notation: Are you able to provide an analogue for C(Ω₂2,0)? Or of Ω₂ itself? (view)
1 August 2021
-
12:07Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment By the way, the function F is the same as f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))+$1}(n), and hence is comparable to f_{ψ_0(... on the article Kanrokoti/2-shifted Subspecies Primitive psi Function: I got it. Thank you. I'll fix it.🐻🐻 (view)
-
10:50ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I don't see an edit button. I think it's just you who can edit it, although you could of course e... on the article Username5243/XKCD My Number is Bigger Notations: User blogs can only be edited by admins, actually, but user pages, can actually edit by anyone. (view)
-
08:41P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment By the way, the function F is the same as f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))+$1}(n), and hence is comparable to f_{ψ_0(... on the article Kanrokoti/2-shifted Subspecies Primitive psi Function: > If F(n) := f_{ε_0}^n(n), then F(n) ≒ f_{ε_0+1}(n) ? Yes. > If F(n) := f_{ε_0}(n), then F^n(n)... (view)
-
08:11DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment My immediate intuition on whether or not a number terminates in the 3x+1 problem is the following: f... on the article DAno80/A Function on the 3x+1 problem: Surely all power of 2 do... (view)
-
08:02Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment By the way, the function F is the same as f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))+$1}(n), and hence is comparable to f_{ψ_0(... on the article Kanrokoti/2-shifted Subspecies Primitive psi Function: If F(n) := f_{ε_0}^n(n), then F(n) ≒ f_{ε_0+1}(n) ? If F(n) := f_{ε_0}(n), then F^n(n) ≒ ? (view)
-
08:00DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > 3x+1 problem It is more widely called Collatz problem or Collatz conjecture. (And it is perhaps th... on the article DAno80/A Function on the 3x+1 problem: Ok. (view)
-
05:51P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I think we should have at least one example from every one of the googological sins: 1. infinity... on the article Alemagno12/The pointless googology collection: Right, although Alemagno dealt with mistakes given by beginners. (I dealt also with a little difficu... (view)
-
05:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/A Function on the 3x+1 problem: > 3x+1 problem It is more widely called Collatz problem or Collatz conjecture. (And it is perhaps th... (view)
-
02:38GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/A Function on the 3x+1 problem: My immediate intuition on whether or not a number terminates in the 3x+1 problem is the following: f... (view)
-
02:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think we should have at least one example from every one of the googological sins: 1. infinity... on the article Alemagno12/The pointless googology collection: Alright then. Anyway, basically the mistakes are similar to your blog post, right? (view)
-
02:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I think we should have at least one example from every one of the googological sins: 1. infinity... on the article Alemagno12/The pointless googology collection: So, basically the mistakes are similar to your blog post, right? (view)
31 July 2021
-
22:53Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:DAno80/A Function on the 3x+1 problem: I'd define f(n) as the longest reduction chain for all number ≤ n. Or P(n) is the largest number t... (view)
-
22:51Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/A Function on the 3x+1 problem: I'd define f(n) as the longest reduction chain for all number ≤ n, just so that values don't get s... (view)
-
22:14P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment By the way, the function F is the same as f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))+$1}(n), and hence is comparable to f_{ψ_0(... on the article Kanrokoti/2-shifted Subspecies Primitive psi Function: I meant that the phrase is defined as F(n)=f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))}^n(n). I name F(10^{100}) "2-shifted Subsp... (view)
-
15:36Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment By the way, the function F is the same as f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))+$1}(n), and hence is comparable to f_{ψ_0(... on the article Kanrokoti/2-shifted Subspecies Primitive psi Function: That's a bit difficult for me... (view)
-
14:00Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) for non negative integers a and b. d... (view)
-
14:00Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) for non negative integers a and b. d... (view)
-
13:57Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) for non negative integers a and b. d... (view)
-
13:56Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) for natural numbers a and b. def f(a... (view)
-
12:47Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) def f(a,b): val = [a,b] whil... (view)
-
12:39Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) def f(a,b): val = [a,b] whil... (view)
-
12:37Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Here is an example of how this could look. This computes f_b(a) def f(a,b): val = [a,b] whil... (view)
-
12:19Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/200!: I think the easiest (but not the shortest) way to program the FGH in python is to use lists. So for ... (view)
-
08:39P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I think we should have at least one example from every one of the googological sins: 1. infinity... on the article Alemagno12/The pointless googology collection: At least, it is well-defined (if you mean (graham's number)^{graham's number}), and hence does not s... (view)
-
07:46ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I think we should have at least one example from every one of the googological sins: 1. infinity... on the article Alemagno12/The pointless googology collection: Well, how about "Superior-graham"? (view)
-
05:43P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Kanrokoti/2-shifted Subspecies Primitive psi Function: By the way, the function F is the same as f_{ψ_0(Λ(n))+$1}(n), and hence is comparable to f_{ψ_0(... (view)
-
05:31P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Oh... (view)
-
03:55Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: I welcome all suggestions and feedbacks. (view)
-
02:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Good. Thank you. Since this does not answer my the question, could you tell me if my question was ba... (view)
-
02:18Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Done. I changed the first sentence. (view)
-
02:03P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: I asked you a question that you know the definition of Veblen function, suggested to check Kleene's ... (view)
-
01:30Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: @P進大好きbot I took your suggestion. Please refer to Section 5. (view)
-
00:37P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Computable numbers vs uncomputable numbers: Good. But there are several problems. A "computable number" can have a short defining formula which ... (view)
-
00:31P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Computable numbers vs uncomputable numbers: Good. But there are several problems. A "computable number" can have a short defining formula which ... (view)
-
00:30P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Computable numbers vs uncomputable numbers: Good. But there are several problems. A "computable number" can have a short defining formula which ... (view)
-
00:14P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: I wonder why you frequently ignore suggestions and questions when you request feedbacks... Anyway, I... (view)
-
00:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: I wonder why you frequently ignore questions when you request feedbacks... (view)
30 July 2021
-
21:51Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Thanks for the clarification. (view)
-
21:39GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: The Small Veblen ordinal is the limit of the Veblen function extended to finitary positions. Using t... (view)
-
21:39GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: The Small Veblen ordinal is the limit of the Veblen function extended to finitary positions. Using t... (view)
-
14:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: As long as you only consider the case where the value of the transfinitary variable is 1, it expands... (view)
-
13:55Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Hi, can you explain which one is correct for φ((1,O+1)) (where O denotes intermediary ordinal after... (view)
-
13:55Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Fast-growing hierarchy? I mean, it's based on recursion and addition. on the article Tetramur/Big functions: No. In fact, for ordinals alpha greater than 1 it is roughly based on exponential. (view)
-
13:54Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Hi, can you explain which one is correct for φ((1,O+1)) (where O denotes intermediary ordinal after... (view)
-
13:51Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Hi, can you explain which one is correct for φ((1,O+1)) (where O denotes intermediary ordinal after... (view)
-
13:49Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Hi, can you explain which one is correct for φ((1,O+1)) (where O denotes intermediary ordinal after... (view)
-
13:46Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Hi, can you explain which one is correct for φ((1,O+1)) (where O denotes intermediary ordinal after... (view)
-
13:45Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Hi, can you explain which one is correct for φ((1,O+1)) (where O denotes intermediary ordinal after... (view)
-
12:16P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: > Every googologist knows Veblen function. By the way, it is incorrect. Even if you do not know goog... (view)
-
10:22P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: LVO is expressed as φ((1,φ((1,…)))) with respect to the PSS-type convention of transfinitary ari... (view)
-
09:57Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... on the article Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: Thanks for your time. Can you please express LVO in terms of φ(...), like SVO = φ(1,0,0, ... ,0,0)... (view)
-
09:51P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Although I do not know python well, I wonder how f(1,3) is computed in this process. I guessed that ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Hmm...? Does python deal with the "return" sentence in that way? For example, "b = f(a,b)" instead o... (view)
-
09:31Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Although I do not know python well, I wonder how f(1,3) is computed in this process. I guessed that ... on the article Mumuji/200!: Then again, this is not perfect and is slightly faster (maybe). Since it is in range, it should be 3... (view)
-
09:30ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment A quick note: \(SPi(n)-n\) on average tends to infinity. This is because average size of a gap be... on the article KthulhuHimself/The pointless and arbitrary function dustbin.: Perfect number is only defined for 51 numbers, right? So Perf(51) = 1.1085×10^49,724,094 right? (view)
-
09:30ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A quick note: \(SPi(n)-n\) on average tends to infinity. This is because average size of a gap be... on the article KthulhuHimself/The pointless and arbitrary function dustbin.: Perfect number is only defined for 51 numbers, right? So Perf(51) = 1.1085×10<sup>49,724,094</sup> ... (view)
-
08:31P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/200!: Although I do not know python well, I wonder how f(1,3) is computed in this process. I guessed that ... (view)
-
08:30P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/200!: Although I do not know python well, how does f(1,3) is computed? I guess that it returns f(0,f(0,3))... (view)
-
08:21Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I thought that it's about "faxul", because of the "200!" thing here. on the article Mumuji/200!: Haha no (view)
-
08:16ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/200!: I thought that it's about "faxul", because of the "200!" thing here. (view)
-
07:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: So, endingixul, is larger than BIGG, right? (view)
-
06:11GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Msiajoe74/Veblen Function primed: The Large Veblen ordinal is the supremum of the Veblen function extended to transfinitary positions.... (view)
-
06:01GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment If you read discussion here I was quite neutral for this, and thought that we do not make discord as... on the article GamesFan2000/Issues concerning the deletion of the page for the Discord server: Thank you (view)
-
02:02VoidSansXD (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/OCF using a to rank-into-rank cardinal: wow this is so readable (view)
29 July 2021
-
13:33ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Googleaarex/The new -illion system.: Is there a new version of the -illions? (view)
-
12:40ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Note: I made a new blog post regarding FandomDesktop reverted to Oasis skin for no reason. (Link: h... (view)
-
05:17ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment grangol is googol-99-plex and I make a grangol blog post!!!! on the article Googleaarex/Googol: That's impossible to make grangolth blog post, definitely takes ages to create it. (view)
-
04:58Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Issues concerning the deletion of the page for the Discord server: If you read discussion here I was quite neutral for this, and thought that we do not make discord as... (view)
-
04:57Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Issues concerning the deletion of the page for the Discord server: If you read discussion here I was quite neutral for this, and thought that we do not make discord as... (view)
-
04:48P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this supposed to be a OCF? I am not sure. But I see that it can generate large ordinals. I also l... on the article P進大好きbot/Analysis on 四関数: Thank you. This is not defined in terms of an OCF, but I expect that there is an actual OCF compatib... (view)
-
04:28Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment and more numbers. on the article Googleaarex/Infinite Numbers: Ok.... (view)
-
04:28Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What is this post for? on the article Googleaarex/Numbers Order: Presumably for people who cannot count. (view)
-
04:26Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment grangol is googol-99-plex and I make a grangol blog post!!!! on the article Googleaarex/Googol: What (view)
-
04:26Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I presume this is a joke ? on the article Googleaarex/Infinity: Hopefully (view)
-
04:25Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I got a copy of the text of Gigoombaverse, if Billybob-Mario doesn't own the copyright or object I s... on the article Billybob-mario/I like making big numbers: The deletion reason just says (dafaq), and i think that's kinda ok. (view)
-
04:22Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Billybob-mario/I like making big numbers: If you clik the links you can see a snippet of the original. (view)
-
04:21Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Billybob-mario/I like making big numbers: Maybe, next time, when making the first blog post, think about how important it is and don't post sa... (view)
-
04:17Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Pillar Function: It's cool and all, but, why do you need an array separator (,) when there are no arrays in this lang... (view)
-
04:12Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Tetramur/Big functions: Fast-growing hierarchy? I mean, it's based on recursion and addition. (view)
-
04:11Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: Yes, I saw it too. I kinda like the new desktop, as it "feels" less laggy. (view)
-
04:09Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Analysis on 四関数: Is this supposed to be a OCF? I am not sure. But I see that it can generate large ordinals. I also l... (view)
-
03:00P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I don't know why people use uncountable ordinals in FGH. If ω_1 is the first uncountable ordinal, i... on the article MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: It is true that FGH is ill-defined for an uncountable ordinal (or even for a countable ordinal in th... (view)
-
02:36Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: I don't know why people use uncountable ordinals in FGH. If ω_1 is the first uncountable ordinal, i... (view)
-
02:27
-
02:23Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Analysis on 四関数: Amazing (view)
-
02:02P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Issues concerning the deletion of the page for the Discord server: Thank you for the proposal. I also commented on this as a reply to Ubersketch. The crossing paths oc... (view)
-
02:01P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Issues concerning the deletion of the page for the Discord server: Thank you for the proposal. I also commented on this as a reply to Ubersketch. The crossing paths oc... (view)
-
01:56P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Where do you think this started with? The unresolvable conflict between Googology Discord and Googol... on the article GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: > We lived in harmony, and members on both platforms made contributions to each other. I understand ... (view)
-
01:49ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I reported this to Fandom with a link to this thread. on the article ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: Thanks, I'm looking forward for the follow up of what's happening. (view)
-
01:36P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Concerning this page: https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/Googology_Wiki:Discord So I reverted an edit ... on the article GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: I am afraid that you misunderstood the timestamp. The discussion was done three weeks ago, and then ... (view)
-
00:30Ubersketch (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: Concerning this page: https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/Googology_Wiki:Discord So I reverted an edit ... (view)
-
00:27Ubersketch (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: Concerning this page: https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/Googology_Wiki:Discord So I reverted an edit ... (view)
28 July 2021
-
23:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... on the article DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: Thank you. First Order Logic is kind of a sort of logic. In order to express a number by a First Ord... (view)
-
20:50DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... on the article DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: You are not phrasing bad, also, thanks for pointing out the mistake, i thought First Order Logic was... (view)
-
17:29Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I reported this to Fandom with a link to this thread. on the article ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: I got a reply: Thanks for contacting us. I believe this is expected right now, as we need to make so... (view)
-
17:28Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I reported this to Fandom with a link to this thread. on the article ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: I got a reply: : Thanks for contacting us. I believe this is expected right now, as we need to make ... (view)
-
16:35Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: I reported this to Fandom with a link to this thread. (view)
-
11:06P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Right. We should not offend others, even when they offend us. Also, I am sorry if I made some new mi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-28) Let's not provoke them: I see. I avoid from writing sentences which might have a risk to cause suspicion. I noticed that it ... (view)
-
10:53Hexirp (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Right. We should not offend others, even when they offend us. Also, I am sorry if I made some new mi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-28) Let's not provoke them: It is not about that, it is related to it. (view)
-
10:28P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... on the article DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: Actually, there is a notion called First Order Logic. But "The Largest Positive Integer that can be ... (view)
-
10:18DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... on the article DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: [a,b,c,d] is the same rule. For First Order Logic, even i did not know the existance until a week ag... (view)
-
07:31GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Where do you think this started with? The unresolvable conflict between Googology Discord and Googol... on the article GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: I didn't blame Username for anything. I only stated what they said in their most recent blog post. U... (view)
-
07:28GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Where do you think this started with? The unresolvable conflict between Googology Discord and Googol... on the article GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: I didn't blame Username for anything. I only stated what they said in their most recent blog post. U... (view)
-
04:32Eryx Jayakari (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: Where do you think this started with? The unresolvable conflict between Googology Discord and Googol... (view)
-
04:30P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I feel very sorry about the whole incident... The beginning of this incident is perhaps the abuse of... on the article GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: Indeed, I appreciate your kind feedbacks (to me and also others). I think that not only I, but also ... (view)
-
04:27P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > Superrayo A similar naming can be found in "Category:Numbers by Garrett Wilkinson". Say, (Rayo's n... on the article MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: Yes, I know it. Sorry for the ambiguity. I just showed a similar naming for a different number. (view)
-
04:22P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events 2: I have already apologised several times for the possibility that I made mistakes, but I seem not to ... (view)
-
04:07MultiSoul (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > Superrayo A similar naming can be found in "Category:Numbers by Garrett Wilkinson". Say, (Rayo's n... on the article MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: Rayo^rayo's number (10^100) is equal to: R(R(R(R(R(.... Rayo's number times.... (10^100)....))))). (view)
-
03:16GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I feel very sorry about the whole incident... The beginning of this incident is perhaps the abuse of... on the article GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: I actually wasn't privy to anything involving UN5243 abusing their admin rights. And I appreciate th... (view)
-
03:12P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:MultiSoul/My Custom Numbers!: > Superrayo A similar naming can be found in "Category:Numbers by Garrett Wilkinson". Say, (Rayo's n... (view)
-
03:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-28) Let's not provoke them: Right. We should not offend others, even when they offend us. Also, I am sorry if I made some new mi... (view)
-
03:01P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/This community has gone to hell...: I feel very sorry about the whole incident... The beginning of this incident is perhaps the abuse of... (view)
-
02:36Hexirp (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: On Googology Server, verbal abuse of p-shin-daisuki-bot goes unpunished. That's all I know. (view)
-
02:24P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It is pity that you feel unpleasant against this great community. I think that you are missing sever... on the article Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: Sure, as long as you stop labeling me any more and correct false information. If you continue it, yo... (view)
-
01:35Username5243 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It is pity that you feel unpleasant against this great community. I think that you are missing sever... on the article Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: Can you please give a substantial example of someone on the Discord being racist? I would very much ... (view)
-
01:26P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: It is pity that you feel unpleasant against this great community. I think that you are missing sever... (view)
-
01:16P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: It is pity that you feel unpleasant against this great community. I think that you are missing sever... (view)
-
01:03Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... on the article Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: Unpop Opinion: Fandom Desktop better. I feel that the old version has problems with the loading on m... (view)
-
00:46ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... on the article Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: And also, this wiki will be force migrated to the new Fandom Desktop, as stated in the notice above... (view)
-
00:23Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... on the article Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: Idk, old version laggy (view)
-
00:03Username5243 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... on the article Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: The forced "upgrades" of Fandom software are another reason I've been inactive. i liked the way it w... (view)
27 July 2021
-
23:59Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: Yeah this really is just supposed to be a fun hobby, if people want to take it serious then sure the... (view)
-
23:50Moooosey (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... (view)
-
23:48Moooosey (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... (view)
-
23:47Moooosey (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... (view)
-
23:47Moooosey (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: <blockquote> ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themsel... (view)
-
23:47Moooosey (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Username5243/Pbot, this is ENOUGH! I'm leaving!: > ...and most users there do this stuff (gasp!) for FUN, not in an attempt to get themselves taken s... (view)
-
21:30GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: Can confirm that it changed back from FandomDesktop to the old format (view)
-
13:57ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Note: I made a new blog post regarding FandomDesktop reverted to Oasis skin for no reason. (Link to... (view)
-
12:02ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: It looks like, only the Wikia (wikia.org) pages are affected, but not from Fandom. (view)
-
11:09ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: It looks like, Wikia (wikia.org) pages are affected, but not from Fandom. (view)
-
07:40Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/About FandomDesktop thingy: Same for me. It suddenly happened several days ago. How about other users? (view)
-
07:36P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment TR function on the article Tetramur/Big functions: Of course. There can be many interesting choices of T. That is the point that TR function is cool. (view)
-
07:12Tetramur (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Tetramur/Big functions: Laver tables in case they are total. (view)
-
07:11Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment TR function on the article Tetramur/Big functions: Specifically I0 function, which is TR(ZFC+I0,n). TR series of functions depend on theory T and numbe... (view)
-
02:35P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for that, as I'm now having bureaucrat rights on this wiki. So that I can promote someone ... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: I feel happy that this wiki now looks quite lively. (view)
-
02:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for that, as I'm now having bureaucrat rights on this wiki. So that I can promote someone ... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: Thanks to myself, I was able to resolve the problems given, and make this wiki "alive" again. (view)
26 July 2021
-
23:02FundamentalSeq (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Rgetar/Order in "base-booster" designations: I did the same reversal when I unsuccessfully attempted to port the code to Python - I believe I set... (view)
-
22:34P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you. And I also feel very sorry for BlankEntity's leaving... The user helped to maintain artic... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: Thank you! (view)
-
16:47Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Tetramur/Big functions: Greedy Clique functions (view)
-
15:15RightLefts (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you. And I also feel very sorry for BlankEntity's leaving... The user helped to maintain artic... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: Maybe 'indicated' or 'mentioned' would be better for the phrase you were going for. (view)
-
14:48P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Tetramur/Big functions: TR function (view)
-
14:44Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Loader's Function. on the article Tetramur/Big functions: Thanks for your answer! (How I could forget such simple function...) (view)
-
13:59DAno80 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Tetramur/Big functions: Loader's Function. (view)
-
12:44ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Nayuta Ito/Lynz clock on Microsoft Excel: Let me check the code, and see if it works. (view)
-
12:28ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment What do you think about the new Fandom desktop layout? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Unfortunately, it got reverted to the old Oasis skin, for some reason. Can I attach a screenshot as ... (view)
-
09:51MultiSoul (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You might be interested in my list of Conway's -illion numbers and the modified version which is reg... on the article MultiSoul/My List Of Illion Numbers!!!: Ok (view)
-
09:12Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:MultiSoul/My List Of Illion Numbers!!!: You might be interested in my list of Conway's -illion numbers and the modified version which is reg... (view)
-
09:07Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why big number at end? on the article LightLightsLarLabLiblas/The aftermath: Ok (view)
-
03:48P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you. And I also feel very sorry for BlankEntity's leaving... The user helped to maintain artic... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: > something that isn't true Oh, I did not know it. Thank you for the correction. Could you tell me h... (view)
-
03:20RightLefts (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why big number at end? on the article LightLightsLarLabLiblas/The aftermath: They probably spell out things in different bases, I've seen BlankEntity do it on other sites. (view)
-
03:17RightLefts (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: It is truly disappointing what happened, let's hope we'll recover in due time. (view)
-
03:16RightLefts (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you. And I also feel very sorry for BlankEntity's leaving... The user helped to maintain artic... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: Not to be rude, but please note that "blame" can sometimes be a bad thing to say, as it usually indi... (view)
-
02:52ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: Well... whose gonna define Q in letter notation? (view)
-
02:46ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I thought that it's used for PEGG, as it's currently nearly approaching Q. on the article Literally Legendary/Q: PEGG: Psi's Ever Growing Googolism. There is a blog post regarding it on this wiki. Check it out as ... (view)
25 July 2021
-
22:42P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/What is the fastest growing function that grows slower than Rayo(n) that has been defined so far?: I have never seen a well-defined function slower than Rayo(n) but faster than CoRayo(n). User blog:P... (view)
-
22:10ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I thought that it's used for PEGG, as it's currently nearly approaching Q. on the article Literally Legendary/Q: PEGG: Psi's Ever Growing Googolism. There is a blog post regarding it on this wiki. Check it out as ... (view)
-
20:39Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/What is the fastest growing function that grows slower than Rayo(n) that has been defined so far?: To be honest I don't really know, but ITTM's seem like a good candidate. (view)
-
19:02Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo @C7X So, what do you think about me to become admin? (view)
-
17:55Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I thought that it's used for PEGG, as it's currently nearly approaching Q. on the article Literally Legendary/Q: I just chose Q as a random letter to name those numbers Also what is PEGG (view)
-
17:49Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I thought that it's used for PEGG, as it's currently nearly approaching Q. on the article Literally Legendary/Q: I just chose Q as a random letter to name those numbers (view)
-
17:49Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I thought that it's used for PEGG, as it's currently nearly approaching Q. on the article Literally Legendary/Q: I just chose a random letter to name those numbers (view)
-
14:05Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... on the article DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: [a,b,c,d] is now the problem. As before, you did not specify for the amount of a's or b's. As well ... (view)
-
13:58Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Please use mathjax. on the article RudyStaysForever/Successor function B: Actually, the wiki policy asks us to try to use mathjax. It's very similar to PNG math, just use \( ... (view)
-
12:46ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What do you think about the new Fandom desktop layout? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Unfortunately, it got reverted to the old Oasis skin, for some reason. (view)
-
09:38DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... on the article DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: [3,4,3] = 3->3->4->4, i did not specify that but this is the rule. (view)
-
08:17ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks, some of the LaTeX doesn't render properly, actually. on the article Kaptain Kerbab/Semi-Large Numbers and a Boring Class: Can I fix it anyway? (view)
-
05:43RudyStaysForever (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Please use mathjax. on the article RudyStaysForever/Successor function B: (view)
-
05:42RudyStaysForever (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Please use mathjax. on the article RudyStaysForever/Successor function B: It's Simpler to Do PNG Math in Here, as it includes Examples (view)
-
05:40RudyStaysForever (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Please use mathjax. on the article RudyStaysForever/Successor function B: \(f(x)\) (view)
-
02:36Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: Try to use mathjax. -> is \(\rightarrow \). a->b = \(a\rightarrow b\) Also, for the rule a->a->a->a-... (view)
24 July 2021
-
22:50ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Q: I thought that it's used for PEGG, as it's currently nearly approaching Q. (view)
-
17:38Josewong (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/An Array Notation i cannot give the name: I'm Pretty Sure That [a,b,c] = a->a->a->a->.....->b->b->b->b (with c Chained Arrows). Is Most Likely... (view)
-
10:09ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Kaptain Kerbab/Semi-Large Numbers and a Boring Class: It looks, some of the LaTeX doesn't render properly, actually. (view)
-
05:07ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can I move the joke pages to "my department of rejected numbers"? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Yeah, it is true. I'll do it in my user subpage instead. (view)
-
05:05Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can I move the joke pages to "my department of rejected numbers"? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Something like this? https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/User:Cloudy176/The_Best_of_Deleted_Googologism... (view)
-
02:24ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Can I move the joke pages to "my department of rejected numbers"? (view)
23 July 2021
-
14:26Hexirp (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @Koteitan, I have restored the comments I deleted. I'll leave it like that for a while. (note for me... (view)
-
13:43Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @Hexirp Now the comments has been deleted and normal user can't see them. Isn't it too early to dele... (view)
-
13:38Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @C7X I didn't get what you are saying. In the comments you quoted, I can see Plain labeled Pbot with... (view)
-
07:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for that, as I'm now having bureaucrat rights on this wiki. So that I can promote someone ... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: You're welcome. Had if the incident still ongoing, there's a chance that the number of edits per day... (view)
-
05:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for that, as I'm now having bureaucrat rights on this wiki. So that I can promote someone ... on the article GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: And I forgot to say, thank you, ARsygo. I really appreciate your patient effort to handle this incid... (view)
-
04:21Hexirp (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @C7X, I didn't know that was what p-shin-daisuki-bot was talking about. Can you summarize this kind ... (view)
-
03:31Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:LightLightsLarLabLiblas/The aftermath: Why big number at end? (view)
-
00:42Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The TFBO is the limit of the ordinal notation associated to Buchholz's ordinal collapsing function, ... on the article Literally Legendary/What is the system of fundamental sequences for Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal?: Thanks so much :) (view)
22 July 2021
-
23:20ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: Thank you for that, as I'm now having bureaucrat rights on this wiki. So that I can promote someone ... (view)
-
22:47P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/Final thoughts: Thank you. And I also feel very sorry for BlankEntity's leaving... The user helped to maintain artic... (view)
-
20:13C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: My account is still open as of today. I've just commented on the new admin decision, but I would lik... (view)
-
20:04C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Kyodaisuu has been a member of this community a long time and hasn't ever done anything irresponsibl... (view)
-
14:58P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-22) p進大好きbot and Plain'N'Simple: Thank you! (view)
-
13:01P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: I honestly clarify that I am not doing sanction game. I believe that I am innocent, but I have also ... (view)
-
12:31Josewong (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: I Have A Question Did You Actually Game Sanctions Or Are You Innocent I Would Like An Answer (view)
-
11:37P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: Thank you very much. I feel really happy to hear your kind opinion. (view)
-
11:34Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: I think your tone is perfectly fine, if people want to be insulted or offended they can and will be ... (view)
-
11:33Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: I think your tone is perfectly fine, if people want to be insulted or offended they can and will be ... (view)
-
11:15P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: Thank you for the opinion. Right, my tone might be quite wrong. I frequently emphasise that I only k... (view)
-
10:36Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: I think the tone policing is a problem too, from what I could see you didn't go around insulting peo... (view)
-
10:35Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... on the article GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: I think the tone policing is a problem too, from what I could see you didn't go around insulting peo... (view)
-
08:00ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this for the new logo? on the article Mumuji/test: I'm sorry, I couldn't reply yesterday, as I fell asleep, anyway, how do you change the logo? (view)
-
06:04P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... (view)
-
05:59P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... (view)
-
05:54P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/My opinion on Plain and C7X: Thank you for paying attention to this topic. I was alone when I got blocked before explaining what ... (view)
-
01:30Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The TFBO is the limit of the ordinal notation associated to Buchholz's ordinal collapsing function, ... on the article Literally Legendary/What is the system of fundamental sequences for Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal?: Uncomputable (handling ordinals directly): https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/Extended_Buchholz%27s_fu... (view)
-
01:13Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-22) Logo: Can I ask to have the logo have a background, because I see some issues with the top navbar when you... (view)
-
00:49ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What do you think about the new Fandom desktop layout? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: Let me check it first. (view)
-
00:18Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The TFBO is the limit of the ordinal notation associated to Buchholz's ordinal collapsing function, ... on the article Literally Legendary/What is the system of fundamental sequences for Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal?: I'd be fine with just a link to a page that defines the fundamental sequences of TFBO. (view)
21 July 2021
-
15:31Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What do you think about the new Fandom desktop layout? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: The new design looks so nice. I prefer this new appearance. Left pane is pain on mobile. I could del... (view)
-
13:09Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this for the new logo? on the article Mumuji/test: I would edit it but protected (view)
-
13:08Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Good. You will probably need to replace "<br />" with "\\". on the article Mumuji/test: Ok (view)
-
11:17Hexirp (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/test: Good. You will probably need to replace "<br />" with "\\". (view)
-
10:23Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this for the new logo? on the article Mumuji/test: Thanks (view)
-
10:23Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this for the new logo? on the article Mumuji/test: image Could you edit it as this for a test? (view)
-
10:16Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this for the new logo? on the article Mumuji/test: I know, the plan is to screen cap it and edit it to make it look good. (view)
-
06:33Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The TFBO is the limit of the ordinal notation associated to Buchholz's ordinal collapsing function, ... on the article Literally Legendary/What is the system of fundamental sequences for Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal?: Sorry to bother you, but I would like to point out minor correction... The TFBO is the countable lim... (view)
-
05:53ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is this for the new logo? on the article Mumuji/test: Because br doesn't work properly when rendering. (view)
-
05:34ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/test: Is this for the new logo? (view)
-
05:11Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What do you think about the new Fandom desktop layout? on the article ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: It looks cool, but I like the old logo. (view)
-
05:01ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/Updates on this wiki: What do you think about the new Fandom desktop layout? (view)
20 July 2021
-
23:09GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/What is the system of fundamental sequences for Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal?: The TFBO is the limit of the ordinal notation associated to Buchholz's ordinal collapsing function, ... (view)
-
19:47Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment For starters anything above first order set theory is not yet defined, as in SOST, TOST and so on. 2... on the article Literally Legendary/1st order set theory & 2nd order set theory: What is the difference?: There's a second order set theory formula on this webpage https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/Rayo's_nu... (view)
-
13:02Bogush4 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Alejandro Magno/My -illion is bigger!: Chained Rayo's Function: CR(n)=R(R(R(...(R(R(n) With n R()'s. Vulcanized Rayo's Function: VR(n)= CR(... (view)
-
12:30ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Sn's Numer: I think, it has an intuitive definability, because the number is ill-defined, especially Sn(3). (view)
-
12:26ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-18) Deletion: Note: I'll continue the deletion of some unlicensed files, and replace it with my own diagram. (view)
-
10:38Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment What is this supposed to mean on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-18) Deletion: The first log shows the recent files deleted, and the second log shows the recent contribution of He... (view)
-
10:37Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What is this supposed to mean on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-18) Deletion: The first log shows the recent files deleted, and the second log shows the recent contribution of He... (view)
-
05:03Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I see that you have a conflicting statement. In your first few lines, you wrote "Functions" as one o... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: Also LNGN function is faster than P(n) (view)
-
05:02Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What is this supposed to mean on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-18) Deletion: I mean the logs (view)
-
04:16Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): > or some f(n) we should count it as f(9) and then add 1 byte for each 9 in the input Yes, your unde... (view)
-
03:55ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: No objections on it. Not even in chats. (view)
19 July 2021
-
18:20Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: No objections. (view)
-
17:13GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: No objections; I agree with wanting to verify the circumstances surrounding those warnings. I have a... (view)
-
15:10Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I have no objection. on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: I agree. The reasons are here for 1 and here for 2. (view)
-
15:10Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I have no objection. on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: I agree. The reason is here for 1 and here for 2. (view)
-
15:07Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have no objection. on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: I agree. The reason is here for 1 and here for 2. (view)
-
14:25Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Yeah, but it was a display of concept that was supposed to show how rule 9 doesn't really change any... (view)
-
14:22Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Yeah, but it was a show of concept that was supposed to show how rule 9 doesn't really change anythi... (view)
-
14:21Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Yeah, but it was a show of concept that was supposed to show how rule 9 doesn't really change anythi... (view)
-
10:59Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Yep, in that case, it now becomes 2600 bytes, but BF(2600) ≠ BF(9) is still true. (view)
-
09:04Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Well it doesn't? For example instead of saying "One Byte = one symbol or one character (e.g. +, -, /... (view)
-
08:14Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/1st order set theory & 2nd order set theory: What is the difference?: For starters anything above first order set theory is not yet defined, as in SOST, TOST and so on. 2... (view)
-
08:12Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I have no objection. on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: I have no objections, in fact unblocking pbot might revive the community, perhaps. Regarding the rev... (view)
-
04:02Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-19) Request for Comments: I have no objection. (view)
-
03:50Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Good. Since he is inactive rn, let's set 2 or 3 days for his reply. If he won't reply, then you can ... (view)
-
03:21ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Yeah, sure. I'll just wait for @C7X actually, about that. (view)
-
02:35Hexirp (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What is this supposed to mean on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-18) Deletion: This has nothing to do with the recent incident. (view)
-
02:32Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Removing a dot or adding a redundant word may turn it into an ill-defined publication, so it's self-... (view)
-
02:18Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: Bepp. Maybe stick to FOST next time. (view)
-
01:21GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Hexirp explains what happened https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-15)_quarrel... on the article GamesFan2000/What the hell is going on lately?: Already read it, but thank you. P.S. Oh, it was updated since I last viewed it. (view)
-
01:18GamesFan2000 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Hexirp explains what happened https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-15)_quarrel... on the article GamesFan2000/What the hell is going on lately?: Already read it, but thank you. (view)
18 July 2021
-
22:15DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I see that you have a conflicting statement. In your first few lines, you wrote "Functions" as one o... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: Thanks for pointing out, i will make a quick Edit now to avoid this, P.s. Sorry if i am Editing so m... (view)
-
17:48Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:GamesFan2000/What the hell is going on lately?: Hexirp explains what happened https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-15)_quarrel... (view)
-
15:46Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: I am guessing that Comb(n) should be approximatly n^(2n). (view)
-
15:44Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: Yeah that is very vague, I don't think that is bad as long as the definition still works and it is v... (view)
-
15:06Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo Now Hexirp and Fish are working on rulings. If you also accept me to be an admin, I would li... (view)
-
15:05Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Now Hexirp and Fish are working on rulings. If you also accept me to be an admin, I would like help ... (view)
-
14:52Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: Alternatively, I can use Veblen function of a finite number of arguments (finitary Veblen function) ... (view)
-
14:49Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: Then can I use s(9,9{2}9,9), (I don't think , is a math symbol) which is Strong array Notation, and ... (view)
-
14:43Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Sn's Numer: I see that you have a conflicting statement. In your first few lines, you wrote "Functions" as one o... (view)
-
14:35Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-18) Deletion: What is this supposed to mean (view)
-
13:42Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): I don't mean that we should but that it is possible. I mean that that avoids the rule, or at least I... (view)
-
13:41Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): I mean that that avoids the rule, or at least I didn't find a reason that removing a dot or adding a... (view)
-
13:41Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): I mean that that avoids the rule, or at least I didn't find a reason that removing a dot or adding a... (view)
-
13:07Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-18) I became an Admin: Thank you for accepting to be an admin, as I suggested. I also became an admin to help you. Since th... (view)
-
13:07Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-18) I became an Admin: Thank you for accepting to be an admin, as I suggested. I also became an admin to help you. Since th... (view)
-
11:49Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): @Ynought I think better don't. According to Rule 5, BF(n) should be assigned as BF(9), i.e. BF(2599)... (view)
-
11:42Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Just refer to the regiment page, as it has added approximations in terms of fast-growing hierarchy. on the article Mumuji/Approximations: Oh i didn't know that. Many thanks! You deserve one cookie. 🍪 (view)
-
11:09ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Approximations: Just refer to the regiment page, as it has added approximations in terms of fast-growing hierarchy. (view)
-
10:23Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Well.. it makes my browser to freeze, can I delete this blog post? on the article Mumuji/DO NOT CLICK ON THIS: The whole purpose is that I noticed some guy make one with 10^16000000, which makes the browser run ... (view)
-
10:22Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Well.. it makes my browser to freeze, can I delete this blog post? on the article Mumuji/DO NOT CLICK ON THIS: That’s why I wrote Do not click on this. You can delete it, it’s just to punish people who dare ... (view)
-
10:21Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Epic Salad Hierarchy on the article Mumuji/Accelerated hyper omega Uber long named speeedy high speed Rayo extended fast growing hierarchy: Yes. (view)
-
10:10ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/DO NOT CLICK ON THIS: Well.. it makes my browser to freeze, can I delete this blog post? (view)
-
09:53DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: A symbol is any Number or Notation, Function, symbols in set-theory, basically any Mathematical symb... (view)
-
09:26Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: Comb(2): use at most 2 symbols and use no number greater than 2. 1+1 1+1*1 1+1/1 1*2 2/1 2/1+1 2*1/1... (view)
-
09:20Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: +,-,*,/,^ =, f() and variables are all considered symbols, there is one exempt which is the | symbol... (view)
-
09:16ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like, there's is no comment here... can someone give me more ideas/suggestions? on the article ARsygo/Wiki cleanup: Firstly, let us find the source, but if there is no results other than the wiki, I'll delete it. (view)
-
09:14Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like, there's is no comment here... can someone give me more ideas/suggestions? on the article ARsygo/Wiki cleanup: I would want to help but I approximaten’t (view)
-
09:13Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like, there's is no comment here... can someone give me more ideas/suggestions? on the article ARsygo/Wiki cleanup: Maybe delete those pages which are just junk and have no source? Approximations: Good luck with fact... (view)
-
09:10ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I'll message the user now. (view)
-
09:08Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-18) I became an Admin: Good for you, hope you can try to fix this mess. (view)
-
09:03Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Couldn't you just remove a dot somewhere to avoid rule 9? (view)
-
08:57Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: I think so. Mainly because you didn't say what a symbol is and the logic gets really weird tbh. (view)
-
08:57Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: Oh sorry I understood it wrong, but still what counts as an operator, just + - * / or others too? An... (view)
-
08:56Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: Oh sorry I understood it wrong, but still what counts as an operator, just + - * / or others too? An... (view)
-
08:56Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: Oh sorry I understood it wrong, but still what counts as an operator, just + - * / or others too? An... (view)
-
08:55Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Couldn't you just remove a dot somewhere and avoid rule 9? (view)
-
08:48Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: Oh sorry I understood it wrong, but still what counts as an operator, just + - * / or others too? (view)
-
07:25Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Thanks for pointing out the self-referential paradox. I just added Rule 9. (view)
-
06:37Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo Now since Hexirp accepted, could you please promote @Kyodaisuu to be an admin? (if he accept... (view)
-
06:36Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo Now since Hexirp accepted, could you please promote @Kyodaisuu to be an admin ? (if he accep... (view)
-
06:36Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo Now since Hexirp accepted, could you please promote @Kyodaisuu to be an admin ? (if he accep... (view)
-
06:36Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo Now since Hexirp accepted, could you please promote @Kyodaisuu to be an admin ? (if he accep... (view)
-
06:26Nayuta Ito (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): This blog post takes 2599 bytes, therefore BF(2605)>BF(2605)+1! I WIN! (view)
-
06:23Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Nah, Rayo(10^100) takes close to 10000 bytes. You have to use the bytes of source codes from this ar... (view)
-
06:22Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Nah, Rayo(10^100) takes close to 10000 bytes. You have to use the bytes of source codes from this ar... (view)
-
06:15Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! on the article Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): Nah, Rayo(10^100) takes close to 10000 bytes. You have to use the bytes of source codes from this ar... (view)
-
06:06Nayuta Ito (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Msiajoe74/Byte Function, BF(n): "Rayo's Number" takes 13 bytes so BF(13)=Rayo's Number! I WIN! (view)
-
03:54ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Thank you for that. So, I will promote it. (view)
-
03:49Hexirp (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo @Kyodaisuu I will gladly accept. (view)
-
03:34Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You only put 0s so it's 10^0 = 1 on the article Mumuji/DO NOT CLICK ON THIS: I know. (view)
-
03:33Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: Sorry for forgeting to specify (view)
-
03:31Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... on the article Mumuji/New function: No, numbers aren't symbols and Comb(1) is just 2 because you are trying to make 1 with one symbol, b... (view)
-
01:57Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Confirming the community will and giving a final judgement requires a decision by an admin, especial... (view)
-
01:57Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Confirmin the community will and giving a final judgement requires a decision by an admin, especiall... (view)
-
01:49Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment This whole thing feels super weird to me, no matter who you think did the right or wrong thing. I do... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: (Sorry I noticed that I read your post wrong. so I delete my post) (view)
-
01:46Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment This whole thing feels super weird to me, no matter who you think did the right or wrong thing. I do... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: (view)
-
01:34Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment This whole thing feels super weird to me, no matter who you think did the right or wrong thing. I do... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Don't you think you might want to explain the reason before you say "they are a very cold person"? I... (view)
-
01:32Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment This whole thing feels super weird to me, no matter who you think did the right or wrong thing. I do... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Don't you think you might want to explain the reason before you say "they are a very cold person"? I... (view)
-
01:00Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I think admin is not needed for the decision but it's needed for for doing authorized job (removing ... (view)
17 July 2021
-
20:13Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/DO NOT CLICK ON THIS: You only put 0s so it's 10^0 = 1 (view)
-
20:12Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Accelerated hyper omega Uber long named speeedy high speed Rayo extended fast growing hierarchy: Epic Salad Hierarchy (view)
-
18:45Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: I think so. Mainly because you didn't say what a symbol is and the logic is really weird tbh. (view)
-
18:44Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: I think so. Mainly because you didn't say what a symbol is. (view)
-
18:42Ynought (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: I think so. (view)
-
18:09DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... on the article DAno80/Sn's Numer: So it is Ill-Defined? (view)
-
17:30Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:DAno80/Sn's Numer: Defining a function, that is well-defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... (view)
-
17:27Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Sn's Numer: Defining a function, that is well defined, by words using semantics is very hard. Actually this is p... (view)
-
14:44Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/New function: Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... (view)
-
14:41Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/New function: Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... (view)
-
14:36Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/New function: Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could, even for Comb(1), have infinite 9s. An... (view)
-
14:35Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/New function: Wait do numbers not count as symbols? Because then you could even for Comb(1) have infinite 9s. And ... (view)
-
13:05ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Thank you, I'll just wait for @Hexirp for the reply. (view)
-
11:45Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Alright. (view)
-
11:37ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Try do a request on their respective talk page, and see if the users accepted it.. to me, it's actu... (view)
-
11:33Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I propose that @Kyodaisuu and @Koteitan will also become new admins if they accepts, as they didn't ... (view)
-
11:33Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I propose that @Kyodaisuu and @Koteitan will become new admins if they accepts, as they didn't caus... (view)
-
10:58Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: This whole thing feels super weird to me, no matter who you think did the right or wrong thing. I do... (view)
-
10:35Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... (view)
-
10:34Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but [https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/User_talk:P%E9%80%B2%E5%A4%A7%E5%A5%BD%E3%81%8Dbot?di... (view)
-
10:34Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but [[User_talk:P進大好きbot?diff=prev&oldid=329709|C7X declares that the account will ... (view)
-
09:45ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Alright, I'll deal with it ASAP. (view)
-
09:44Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Yes. So if Hexirp accepts, please do so. (view)
-
09:44Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Yes. So if Hexirp accept, please do so. (view)
-
09:42Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Yes. You have very important role for maintaining this wiki. I am suggesting to hire another admin f... (view)
-
09:36ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I'm just actually needed to make the wiki cleaner by rollbacking unconstructive edits/vandalisms, bl... (view)
-
09:34ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Actually, I can promote @Hexirp to become an admin, as I'm now a bureaucrat. (view)
-
09:23Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... (view)
-
09:22Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but C7X declares that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsible... (view)
-
09:19Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but C7X declaires that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsibl... (view)
-
09:19Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree, but C7X declaires that the account will be deleted. It means that C7X is no more responsibl... (view)
-
09:06Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: @ARsygo, if you do not want to treat this kind of administrative task, and concenrtrate on the edit ... (view)
-
09:04Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: ARsygo, if you do not want to treat this kind of administrative task, and concenrtrate on the edit o... (view)
-
09:04Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Rsygo, if you do not want to treat this kind of administrative task, and concenrtrate on the edit of... (view)
-
09:04Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Rsygo, if you do not want to treat this kind of administrative task, and concenrtrate on the edit of... (view)
-
08:53Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: ARsygo, you are the only admin responsible now because C7X declares that the account will be deleted... (view)
-
08:52Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Rsygo, you are the only admin responsible now because C7X declares that the account will be deleted ... (view)
-
08:52Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Rsygo, you are the only admin responsible now because C7X declares that the account is deleted soon. (view)
-
08:50Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Rsygo, you are the only admin responsible now. (view)
-
08:50Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Why? doesn't @ send a notification? (view)
-
08:50Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: Rsyago, you are the only admin responsible now. (view)
-
08:39Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events: @C7X why did you block him based on the rule of "Wikipedia" page? I think you might want to give the... (view)
-
08:39Koteitan (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events: @C7X why did you block him based on "Wikipedia" page? I think you might want to give the evidence ba... (view)
-
08:29Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments was pbot. so what admi... (view)
-
08:28Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments is pbot. so what admin... (view)
-
08:28Koteitan (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments is pbot. so what admin... (view)
-
08:28ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments is pbot. so what admin... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: So, can you leave a message to @C7X via talk page? (view)
-
08:27ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments is pbot. so what admin... on the article Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: So, can you leave a message to @C7X via talk page? (view)
-
08:26Koteitan (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree. At first, the first person who appealed the help against harassments is pbot. so what admin... (view)
-
03:43Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-17) Blocking: I agree. (view)
-
01:49ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Well, it says, by 1 September, the classic sites (which the website based on it) is no longer access... on the article A Hippopotatomus/All of Saibian's secret pages: I guess, it's time to archive before it's too late. (view)
16 July 2021
-
09:22ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:A Hippopotatomus/All of Saibian's secret pages: Well, it says, by 1 September, the classic sites (which the website based on it) is no longer access... (view)
-
01:03Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Trying again: What do you already know about Rayo's number? It will be easier to give you useful ans... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I just got back from vacation, so I'm trying to answer all your questions now. I know that if I take... (view)
15 July 2021
-
19:30C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Here is a big program: to reorder the cardinals in "Cantor's attic" by size. on the article DontDrinkH20/Some Explanations of Certain Large Cardinals: Super 1-huge cardinals are necessarily Σ₅-reflecting, implying greater size of least instance. ht... (view)
-
13:35ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment As the original site is working now, it is just a backup made by someone. on the article ARsygo/Cantor's Attic is back: Oh, I didn't noticed that, because I thought that the link going to be dead for good. (view)
-
13:08Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-07-15) quarrel: How do I put this… I believe it stems from one thing: the unwillingness to accept that a person th... (view)
-
12:24Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Linus128/RBN 1: I think my uncomputable delta wins this delta. (view)
-
06:22ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:LightLightsLarLabLiblas/I'm done, I genuinely quit (2): Why not disable your account, instead of blocking? (view)
-
01:08Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/Cantor's Attic is back: As the original site is working now, it is just a backup made by someone. (view)
-
01:03Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. on the article C7X/Recent events: I'm not sure what there is to check. Just look at the warnings and follow the links. I especially lo... (view)
-
00:47ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. on the article C7X/Recent events: I guess, you can promote me to become a bureaucrat, before it's too late, because I think, you can p... (view)
-
00:47C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. on the article C7X/Recent events: > the talk page Psi's? I can check, however interpretations are fuzzy enough of these messages that ... (view)
-
00:46ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. on the article C7X/Recent events: I guess, you can promote me to become a bureaucrat, before it's too late (view)
-
00:45C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. on the article C7X/Recent events: > whose gonna be the new bureaucrat of this wiki? I'm not sure, since I don't know the standards for... (view)
-
00:34ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. on the article C7X/Recent events: And also... whose gonna be the new bureaucrat of this wiki? (view)
-
00:20ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Recent events: Can you check the validity of the warning of the talk page? I'm still unclear of what's going on. (view)
14 July 2021
-
20:34C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: One final message before my FANDOM account gets deleted: 1) Please don't post real names without per... (view)
-
07:36ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: Any updates on it? (view)
-
01:10P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: I see. (view)
13 July 2021
-
15:31Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: Yes, that’s why i added the (speedy growing hierarchy) (view)
-
15:30Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/There's no winning: I win. (view)
-
15:19Cymbopogon Cirratus (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: @P進大好きbot· Well anyways I need to get serious here just in case my blog post would get dele... (view)
-
15:10P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: Why do you ask me? I am not insisting it, but the two are insisting it. (view)
-
13:48Cymbopogon Cirratus (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: More specifically, can you try to make the boundary between "doxxing" and "not doxxing" more well-de... (view)
-
13:44Cymbopogon Cirratus (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: @P進大好きbot Regarding your view of "doxxing" and "harassment" Why do you think this counts as ... (view)
-
13:06P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: I think that we should not delete a personal work (even if it is ill-defined), but we should delete ... (view)
-
12:42ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: https://googology.wikia.org/wiki/User_blog:Nayuta_Ito/A_proposal_of_a_new_axiom_in_mathematics:_the_... (view)
-
12:33ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: Can I settle this by deleting this post? (view)
-
12:282-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: @C7X @Hyp cos @Scorcher007 Can you help me to make the idea of my Karauwan cardinal to be well-defin... (view)
-
12:272-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: (view)
-
06:412-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: But I am seriously trying to define the OCF (view)
-
06:092-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: @C7X @Hyp cos @Scorcher007 Can you help me to make the idea of my Karauwan cardinal to be well-defin... (view)
-
06:042-methylbutyl 3-methylbutanoate (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: @P 進大好 @C7X @Hyp cos Can you help me to make the idea of my Karauwan cardinal to be well-defin... (view)
12 July 2021
-
23:01P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: If you two are correct, we should immediately delete this. I do not know the user well, and I do not... (view)
-
17:16Xeed69 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... on the article Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: Agreed "karauwan cardinals" count as doxxing. (view)
-
13:40Username5243 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: Can we please agree that if Embi a.k.a. Muhammad Bukhari Noor comes back, we will delete their posts... (view)
-
13:24P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: Then I would like to point out "SGH" usually means "slow-growing hierarchy" in this community. Slow-... (view)
-
13:09ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Stichopus Chloronotus 8701/An attempt to create an ordinal collapsing function based on the least Karauwan cardinal: I'm sorry, but, it looks like you're using the alternative account of the blocked user User:Muhammad... (view)
-
12:26P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > The Large Number Garden honestly slipped my mind when I made that comment. I meant no insult. Here... (view)
-
12:16Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? on the article UnnamedFish/Badge: I think he is trying to get a badge. (view)
-
12:15Mumuji (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:RudyStaysForever/Test: Yes, you can edit blog posts, edit comments, and make a blog post. EDI... (view)
-
12:14Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:RudyStaysForever/Test: Yes, you can edit blog posts, edit comments, and make a blog post. (view)
-
12:14Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:RudyStaysForever/Successor function B: Please use mathjax. (view)
-
12:03Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: >BEAF is well-known to be ill -defined Yes, i know, so, maybe just up to linear arrays or multidimen... (view)
-
11:05Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment @Literally_Legendary I deeply apologize that you found yourself in the middle of a feud that has abs... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I've already apologized for forgetting about your Large Garden Number when I made that comment. Also... (view)
-
10:29Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: P-bot, The Large Number Garden honestly slipped my mind when I made that comment. I meant no insult.... (view)
-
09:50P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: So, don't you apologise ALL of your rude attitudes? What you did is just admitting only the fact tha... (view)
-
09:43ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Wythagoras/Pound Star Analysis: How does "#*((1))*2639" solve? (view)
-
09:30ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Googleaarex/More Pound-Star Notation Numbers: How does this number approximated using other notations? (view)
-
08:54Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Yes, I used to be rude and over-judgemental towards people who made obvious mistakes. Thanks to what... (view)
-
05:17P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Thank you. Now it is his turn to apologise ALL of his rude and insulting attitudes, and hence let's ... (view)
-
04:55ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I replied and explained it on my talk page, actually. (view)
11 July 2021
-
23:08P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @ARsygo Now he admited one of his fakes, but he never apologises. Also, he added new fakes. Please j... (view)
-
23:06P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > In short: I say it's about time we stop being held hostage by a conversation we both fucked up a y... (view)
-
22:57P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment @Literally_Legendary I deeply apologize that you found yourself in the middle of a feud that has abs... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: The one who is harassing others is you. Couldn't you remember your comment "Inventing a number which... (view)
-
17:44RudyStaysForever (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:RudyStaysForever/Successor function B: C2A (view)
-
16:19Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Trying again: What do you already know about Rayo's number? It will be easier to give you useful ans... (view)
-
15:54Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment @Literally_Legendary I deeply apologize that you found yourself in the middle of a feud that has abs... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Will you cut this out? Seriously, I can't ask another person a simple question without you barging i... (view)
-
15:39Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: E10##########4 (anybody knows how to do subscripts?) (view)
-
15:30Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @ARsygo I'm beginning to see how this misunderstanding started. It's quote #3 on p-bot's list. My ph... (view)
-
13:03P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @ARsygo Thank you! Please do not hesitate to ask us where the sources of our statements are. (My sta... (view)
-
12:48ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: @Plain'N'Simple What is an approximation of the current value of PEGG in terms of Extended Hyper-E n... (view)
-
12:48ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: @Plain'N'Simple What is an approximation of the current value of PEGG in terms of Hyper-E notation? (view)
-
12:48ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: @Plain'N'Simple What is an approximation of the current value of PEGG in terms of [[Hyper-E notation... (view)
-
12:45ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @P進大好きbot @Plain'N'Simple Now, let me check all of the proofs here, and we'll resolve it, a... (view)
-
12:44ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @P進大好きbot @Plain'N'Simple Now, let me check all of the proofs here, and we'll resolve it. (view)
-
12:17P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @ARsygo Now, you see that he seems to be in panic due to the situation he might be judged due to his... (view)
-
12:12P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > 1. Obvious lie. You actually wrote "If one of my answers seems to contradict another, point it out... (view)
-
12:10P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > 1. Obvious lie. You actually wrote "If one of my answers seems to contradict another, point it out... (view)
-
11:52Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @ARsygo I see that P-bot has given you his side of the story. Now it's my turn (and I'll do my best ... (view)
-
09:46P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: I like the terminology "faster-growng hierarchy" which people use, because it is nothing wrong and i... (view)
-
09:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: I like the terminology "faster-growng hierarchy" which people use, because of it is nothing wrong an... (view)
-
09:25Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: Faster technically is ambiguious, because I did not expect it to be very fast, just faster. But it c... (view)
-
06:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment @Literally_Legendary I deeply apologize that you found yourself in the middle of a feud that has abs... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Good! You finally understand that you need to apologise your rude attitude to the OP! You understand... (view)
-
06:08P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment @Literally_Legendary I deeply apologize that you found yourself in the middle of a feud that has abs... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Good! You finally understands that you need to apologise your rude attitude to the OP! You understan... (view)
-
06:06P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @ARsygo By the way, could you also judge the validity of his insulting? You can see his rude comment... (view)
-
05:55P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > Give an example of one (not 2 or 5 or 17) misconception that you are sure that I have today. One t... (view)
-
05:52P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > Give an example of one (not 2 or 5 or 17) misconception that you are sure that I have today. One t... (view)
-
03:57Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @Literally_Legendary I deeply apologize that you found yourself in the middle of a feud that has abs... (view)
-
03:32Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Splendid. (view)
-
03:12Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I have a proposal for you: Give an example of one (not 2 or 5 or 17) misconception that you are sure... (view)
-
03:10ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Let me check first what does it mean, because I actually don't understand what is the definition yet... (view)
-
03:09Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I have a proposal for you: Give an example of one (not 2 or 5 or 17) misconception that you are sure... (view)
-
03:06Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I have a proposal for you: Give an example of one (not 17) misconception that you are sure that I ha... (view)
-
03:06Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I have a proposal for you: Give an example of one (not 17) misconception that you are sure that I ha... (view)
-
02:32P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Even if you are making mistake, your rude labeling "Inventing a number which is larger than Rayo's n... (view)
-
02:23Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: This is getting out of hand. @A Rsygo , can you tell P-bot to stop chasing me around, disrupting con... (view)
-
02:13P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I noticed that there are some mainspace categories here, can I remove it? on the article Beanos222/My large googol: Sure. (view)
-
02:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @Literally Legendary As you can see below, the one who is commenting above is just trying to behave ... (view)
-
02:03P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment For example, you can use the method in "Fundamental sequences" section in the article which you are ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I specify fundamental sequences for Church-Kleene ordinal?: Then I assume that you know the definition of the notion of TM, but do not know a standard way to en... (view)
-
02:01P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment For example, you can use the method in "Fundamental sequences" section in the article which you are ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I specify fundamental sequences for Church-Kleene ordinal?: One standard strategy is to consider only TMs whose data are finite tuples of natural numbers, becau... (view)
-
01:44ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Beanos222/My large googol: I noticed that there are some mainspace categories here, can I remove it? (view)
-
01:42Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment For example, you can use the method in "Fundamental sequences" section in the article which you are ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I specify fundamental sequences for Church-Kleene ordinal?: I don't know how to enumerate Turing Machines. (view)
-
01:39Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/No's Number: Turing machines are well-defined rulesets with predictable steps. You are just vaguely describing a ... (view)
-
01:00P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is there any common mistakes when defining this? on the article DAno80/No's Number: Right. Completely same as the past log post by the author. It is ill-defined by Common failure 8.4: ... (view)
-
00:38P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > I refuse to continue talking to a person who is this toxic and judgemental. And I definitely don't... (view)
-
00:31ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/No's Number: Is there any common mistakes when defining this? (view)
10 July 2021
-
23:09Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Uh, I have already explained your mistake on Con(X), but you seem not to listen to it. Anyway, it is... on the article Plain'N'Simple/Question to the experts: Is this statement really false?: >Alwe said that Alwe has no time to deal with you. Given then he chose you to be his spokesman, I'm ... (view)
-
22:49Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Okay, I'm done here. I refuse to continue talking to a person who is this toxic and judgemental. And... (view)
-
19:16Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: It's your blog post. You can do whatever you want :-) You can ignore it if you wish. Or you can simp... (view)
-
10:19ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment And now, this wiki has a message stating it will change into FandomDesktop. on the article C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): How about the subscript part? Is it OK? (view)
-
10:03Kanrokoti (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The 3.4 of "Fundamental Sequence" part is not in English. on the article Kanrokoti/2-shifted psi Function: Thank you! Now it's done! (view)
-
10:00Hyp cos (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Kanrokoti/2-shifted psi Function: The 3.4 of "Fundamental Sequence" part is not in English. (view)
-
06:35Nayuta Ito (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... on the article Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: Oh no, another rounding error? Excel cannot support it, also this is not stored forever (the content... (view)
-
05:13P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? on the article UnnamedFish/Badge: Oops. I meant the original poster, i.e. the author of the blog post. (view)
-
03:48ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): And now, this wiki has a message stating it will change into FandomDesktop. (view)
-
02:41ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? on the article UnnamedFish/Badge: BTW, what's the meaning of OP? is it ordinal points? (view)
9 July 2021
-
23:04P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: I meant that you did not check the precise definition of Rayo's number, which obviously refers to Go... (view)
-
22:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Uh, I have already explained your mistake on Con(X), but you seem not to listen to it. Anyway, it is... on the article Plain'N'Simple/Question to the experts: Is this statement really false?: Alwe said that Alwe has no time to deal with you. You are not ready for formal logic, and shoud not ... (view)
-
16:34Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Uh, I have already explained your mistake on Con(X), but you seem not to listen to it. Anyway, it is... on the article Plain'N'Simple/Question to the experts: Is this statement really false?: I've already checked it, long ago. And if I could have figured it out myself, I wouldn't be asking. ... (view)
-
16:19Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: >as you skipped to check the precise definition of Rayo's number... It would be something like this:... (view)
-
16:10Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Uh, I have already explained your mistake on Con(X), but you seem not to listen to it. Anyway, it is... on the article Plain'N'Simple/Question to the experts: Is this statement really false?: I've already checked it, long ago. And if I could have figured it out myself, I wouldn't be asking. ... (view)
-
16:02Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: >as you skipped to check the precise definition of Rayo's number... It would be something like this:... (view)
-
16:01Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: >as you skipped to check the precise definition of Rayo's number... It would be something like this:... (view)
-
14:36P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Plain'N'Simple/Question to the experts: Is this statement really false?: Uh, I have already explained your mistake on Con(X), but you seem not to listen to it. Anyway, it is... (view)
-
14:31P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? on the article UnnamedFish/Badge: I have already put one warning because the OP continued it after my comment explaining the policy. (view)
-
14:30ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? on the article UnnamedFish/Badge: So... if it persists... then we put the warning template in the user's talk page, right? (view)
-
14:27P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? on the article UnnamedFish/Badge: That is why I suggested to revise the warning rule to allow to warn all intentional violations at a ... (view)
-
14:12ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:UnnamedFish/Badge: It looks like it's a blank blog post... what shall we do about it? (view)
-
14:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Well, it is good to understand that what you are insisting to me just fits to you instead of me. You... (view)
-
13:06Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Yes. You have spent so much time explaining, the you haven't any time left to listen. And you are no... (view)
-
08:44P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: > Could you approximate it with ordinals? is it like omega+1 or something like that? F_{α+1}^2 is b... (view)
-
07:54Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: >a faster growing hierarchy I guss i should not have chosen that name, it's called so due to me not ... (view)
-
07:52Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: >F_ {α+1}^2(n) Could you approximate it with ordinals? is it like omega+1 or something like that? (view)
-
07:50Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... on the article Mumuji/Faster boi: Actually, what i mean is similar to the kaboodol, to create recursion on the recursion. (sorry for m... (view)
-
02:40P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Someone made a function like this a long time ago but they used Python 3.7.2 on the article Khang2009/py function: I also think that I have ever read this sort of a function using some version of Python at least twi... (view)
-
02:38P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Sorry, I have already explained these issues spending so much time. I do not want to spend additiona... (view)
8 July 2021
-
22:56P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Sorry, I have already explained these issues spending so much time. I do not want to spend additiona... (view)
-
16:29Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Nice list ;-) Now here is a question for you: How many items on the list can you spot, which are dir... (view)
-
13:28P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > Inventing a number which is larger than Rayo's number (excluding naive extensions) is beyond the a... (view)
-
12:37P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Faster boi: A "faster-growing hierachy" usually grows as fast as fast-growing hierarchy. You know that such a hi... (view)
-
12:30Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: >So, perhaps you are guessing that you are completely understanding Rayo's function, and believing t... (view)
-
12:29Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: >So, perhaps you are guessing that you are completely understanding Rayo's function, and believing t... (view)
-
09:36ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... on the article Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: Thanks for the explanation, I'm just curious to know. (view)
-
07:17P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for the explanation. Can I ask you a few questions? 1. We don't need psi to represent the... on the article P進大好きbot/List of common misconceptions about Rathjen's psi: When people define ψ_I(x) as the x-th omega fixed point, then it has no problem. The actual issue i... (view)
-
07:08Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Thank you for the explanation. Can I ask you a few questions? 1. We don't need psi to represent the... on the article P進大好きbot/List of common misconceptions about Rathjen's psi: Answer #4 is pretty unfair to the people of this community. This community has simply defined ψ_I(x... (view)
-
06:46P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > This may not be the traditional way that expert mathematicians do things, but it's certainly the f... (view)
-
06:36P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: > This may not be the traditional way that expert mathematicians do things, but it's certainly the f... (view)
-
05:37Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: >In the introductory course of formal logic, how did you define "a formula" as a term in the very ba... (view)
-
04:36Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... on the article Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: The answer would depend on k. It has been proven that for any positive integer n, there exists an od... (view)
-
04:27P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: @Plain'N'Simple > What do Goedel numbers have to do with understanding Rayo's function? In the most ... (view)
-
04:26P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: In the most standard way to formalise set theory in the base theory, you need Goedel numbers. In the... (view)
-
03:59Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: If any one is interested, here is a Rayo definition for 1 in 30 words, translated into the English S... (view)
-
03:31Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... (view)
-
03:24Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Rayo's function is the formal mathematical equivalent of "the largest number which can be described ... (view)
-
03:20Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: What do Goedel numbers have to do with understanding Rayo's function? All you need to fully understa... (view)
-
03:20Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... on the article Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: What to Goedel numbers have to do with understanding Rayo's function? All you need to fully understa... (view)
-
01:45ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... on the article Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: How about k*2^{18,9,6,3,2,1}+1, where k is an odd number? (view)
-
01:13Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) replied to the comment {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... on the article Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: The really cool thing is that Dshamlin's proof works (with slight variation) for any BEAF structure+... (view)
-
00:36P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I specify fundamental sequences for Church-Kleene ordinal?: For example, you can use the method in "Fundamental sequences" section in the article which you are ... (view)
7 July 2021
-
23:37Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Root2222/Series Number: Well, it's quite a bit larger than 10^7 :-) Using some calculus tricks, I get that the actual value ... (view)
-
23:36Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Root2222/Series Number: Well, it's quite a bit larger than 10<sup>7</sup> :-) Using some calculus tricks, I get that the act... (view)
-
21:40Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Khang2009/py function: Someone made a function like this a long time ago but they used Python 3.7.2 (view)
-
18:10Plain'N'Simple (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Nayuta Ito/Current Value of PEGG: The pressure is on, eh? Don't worry, Q will be defined by mid-September. Oh, and the PLN array-style... (view)
-
15:56Tetramur (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: > Sounds interesting. Thanks for your feedback. Note that Russian is my native language and I use En... (view)
-
15:55Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: > Sounds interesting. Thanks for your feedback. Note that Russian is my native language and I use En... (view)
-
14:47Tetramur (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Tetramur/Laver tables: @P進大好きbot I think that we should regard googology as branch of mathematics "incertae sedis" ... (view)
-
13:57P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: Sounds interesting. (view)
-
13:42Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: You can say this in comparison with another singer who sings worse, but it's somewhat unusual. I can... (view)
-
12:58P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: Then for example, do Russian people say "He is a more singer" when a male person sings a song very w... (view)
-
09:33Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: > interested in the wording This is my style of wording (borrowed from Russian, we generally say lit... (view)
-
02:22Khang2009 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/THE DUCKIE: 10^2^4^8^16^32^64^128^256^512^1024^2048^4096^8192^16384^32768^65536^131072^262144^524288^1048576^209... (view)
-
01:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): What I said is not that you should add contents, but is that you should not refer to unwritten conte... (view)
-
00:23Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): >Before asking to check new update, you should understand that you should have talked about what you... (view)
6 July 2021
-
23:59P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise definition of one ... (view)
-
23:59P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: One fair start point is to understand what a truth predicate is, i.e. the precise efinition of one o... (view)
-
23:54P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Before asking to check new update, you should understand that you should have talked about what you ... (view)
-
23:31Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Sorry, I just noticed it has always been 𝛚↑↑(𝛚+A) = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑A , where A being an o... (view)
-
23:30Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Sorry, I just noticed it has always been 𝛚↑↑(𝛚+A) = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑A But 𝛚↑↑Ord = ... (view)
-
23:27Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Sorry, I just noticed it has always been 𝛚↑↑(𝛚+Ord) = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord But 𝛚↑↑Or... (view)
-
23:26Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Sorry, I just noticed it has always been 𝛚↑↑(𝛚+a) = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑a But 𝛚↑↑Ord = ... (view)
-
18:44Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Rayo's number is, as far as I understand, the largest number that can be defined by an expression of... (view)
-
18:39Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Rayo's number is, as far as I understand, the largest number that can be defined by an expression of... (view)
-
18:39Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/How do I understand Rayo's number?: Rayo's number is, as far as I understand, the largest number that can be defined by an expression of... (view)
-
17:41Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... on the article Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: Your proof is amazing. (view)
-
15:32Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): >Could you talk about what is actually written? I added more detailed description under Section 1. (view)
-
15:23Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): >Section 1 rule and examples A1 to A5 didn't lead 𝛚↑↑Ord = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord. I just added ... (view)
-
15:16Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Section 1 rule and examples A1 to A5 didn't lead 𝛚↑↑Ord = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord. (view)
-
15:15P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Could you talk about what is actually written? (view)
-
15:07Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): >No. Could you please understand that finite examples do not give a definition? It's in this sentenc... (view)
-
14:58Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): > I didn't get where "𝛚↑↑Ord = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord" come from. From the rule in Section 1 ,an... (view)
-
14:55Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): I didn't get where "𝛚↑↑Ord = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord" come from. (view)
-
14:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): No. Could you please understand that finite examples do not give a definition? (view)
-
14:45Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Yes, it's true according to the rule from Section 1. Please refer to the examples. Please also take ... (view)
-
14:40Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Yes, it's true according to the rule from Section 1. Please refer to the examples. Please also take ... (view)
-
14:34Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): "𝛚↑↑Ord = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord" where did this guy spawn from (view)
-
14:19P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Unfortunately, no. It is just ill-defined. (view)
-
14:15Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): NOHO rule in Section 1 gives 𝛚↑↑Ord = 𝞊_0↑𝛚↑Ord, i.e. 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) = ... (view)
-
14:13P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): It is actually a good starting point for discussion, but it is perhaps too difficult for the OP to d... (view)
-
13:40Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Yeah that's correct. We can't start discussion with undefined rules. Defining ↑↑ over 𝛚 will ... (view)
-
13:21P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): It depends on the definition of transfinite hyperoperator, which is not unique. So, even the correct... (view)
-
13:13Koteitan (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚) is not e_0^e_0 but 𝛚^e_0=e_0. e_0^e_0 is not 𝛚↑↑(𝛚↑↑𝛚... (view)
-
09:24ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Googleaarex/Hundred Notation: What is the meaning of "triundred"? (view)
-
09:19ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Nayuta Ito/Extended extended chain notation: Is the notation considered well defined (so far)? (view)
-
09:08Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: Idk, maybe use BEAF because it uses BEAF. (view)
-
09:06Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment That's a big duckie. on the article Mumuji/THE DUCKIE: Bepis. It starts on 7/6 2021 00:00 UTC. (view)
-
06:31P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Ill-defined by so many errors, but I just point out the one biggest error. Common failure 5.6: Unspe... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Ill-defined. It is good for you to llisten to others. (view)
-
06:27Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Ill-defined by so many errors, but I just point out the one biggest error. Common failure 5.6: Unspe... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Please refer to Section 2.iii (view)
-
04:37P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Ill-defined by so many errors, but I just point out the one biggest error. Common failure 5.6: Unspe... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Section 2 is added after I wrote the comment, and hence the existence of section 2 does not solve th... (view)
-
04:34P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Ill-defined by so many errors, but I just point out the one biggest error. Common failure 5.6: Unspe... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Section 2 is added after I wrote the comment, and hence the existence of section 2 does not solve th... (view)
-
04:30Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Uncomputable function that is kind of a salad number function: Wow. (view)
-
04:02Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Ill-defined by so many errors, but I just point out the one biggest error. Common failure 5.6: Unspe... on the article Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Please refer to Section 2. (view)
5 July 2021
-
23:27P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Large Number Fallen Number: Obviously ill-defined by Common failure 8.4: Intuitive Definability Since you made this mistake many... (view)
-
20:20DAno80 (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Excuse me?? Who let you have a HUGE amount of lines that i have to scroll through? (Reminds me of th... on the article DAno80/Vard Number: Problems through making the page. (view)
-
19:59Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/THE DUCKIE: That's a big duckie. (view)
-
17:10Josewong (talk | contribs) replied to the comment {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... on the article Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: Wow That Was Something Even Sbiis Saibian Couldn't Find The Answer To (view)
-
15:27Dshamlin (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Literally Legendary/Hi I have a challenge: {18,9,6,3,2,1}+1 is composite. I can prove it: First off, {18,9,6,3,2} can be expressed as a huge po... (view)
-
14:02ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: How about the -illion version of this number? (view)
-
12:54P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Msiajoe74/S1.0- Systematic Way for Nesting ordinal with Hyper operator (NOHO): Ill-defined by so many errors, but I just point out the one biggest error. Common failure 5.6: Unspe... (view)
-
12:17P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: You can avoid partial specialisation by using case classification on inputs. For more details, pleas... (view)
-
11:01Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: I also removed g(0,1) and made it g(1,1) (view)
-
11:01Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: How do I not use partial specialisation? (view)
-
10:58Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: Maybe the Vel! Because he made it first…? (view)
-
09:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Unfortunately, it is still ill-defined. It is due to partial specialisation, and hence I recommend n... (view)
-
05:23ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: To put this into perspective, {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100} is approximately {10,1... (view)
-
03:52Josewong (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: According To This Page The First 3 Versions Were Made By Vel!/FB100Z While The Fourth And Current Ve... (view)
-
03:42Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: The main problem is the source. But maybe the image’s creator gets the credit. (view)
-
03:41Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.1: Use of Ambiguous Ellipses ("…"s in {a,...,x} = a→⋯→b) Common failure 4.4... on the article Mumuji/Lazy array notation: Really the main problem is I have to define a new function each time, so maybe I’ll stick to a FII... (view)
-
03:38Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Also, how fast does this grow assuming well definedness? (view)
-
03:38Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Oh ok. I believe the problem lies within the first line. Therefore, I have edited it to terminate on... (view)
-
03:34Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: Should we make a page about this? (view)
-
03:34Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: Maybe we can make different types of this number as there are different bases. (view)
-
03:33Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: Yea that seems good. (view)
-
02:58Josewong (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: The-Large-Number-Encyclopediaplex Would Actually Equal 10^{38210,35774078,1442151747,192811112270631... (view)
-
00:55Literally Legendary (talk | contribs) replied to the comment You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... on the article Mumuji/Important thought: Should we call {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100} the The-Large-Number-Encyclopediaplex... (view)
4 July 2021
-
15:18Josewong (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Important thought: You Could Also Convert From Base 36 To Base 10 To Get {38210,35774078,1442151747,1928111122706310100... (view)
-
12:37P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Good job. In addition, such an error frequently occur when you use partial specialisation. Therefore... (view)
-
12:36P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Good job. In addition, such an error frequently occur when you use partial specialisation. Therefore... (view)
-
12:35P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: By the way, I guess that you regard 0 as a positive whole number, but 0 is not positive. (view)
-
12:34P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Good job. In addition, such an error frequently occur when you use partial specialisation. Therefore... (view)
-
12:07Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Oh wait, I see it now. If m > 1 and in the definition I use m+ 1, it means that at minimum m can be ... (view)
-
12:03Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... on the article Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: I have added the 2.2, but I don't find the 4.2. Could you point it out? (view)
-
11:59Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Common failure 2.1: Use of Ambiguous Ellipses ("…"s in {a,...,x} = a→⋯→b) Common failure 4.4... on the article Mumuji/Lazy array notation: (It's called the lazy array notation, the real deal is below) I know how to do recursion but it gets... (view)
-
05:06P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain (The domain of no function in the blog p... (view)
-
05:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Lazy array notation: Common failure 2.1: Use of Ambiguous Ellipses ("…"s in {a,...,x} = a→⋯→b) Common failure 4.4... (view)
-
04:59P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: Common failure 2.2: Lack of the Clarification of the Domain Common failure 4.2: Incomplete Partial S... (view)
-
04:35Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Okish function that is ok: This is made due to me wanting recursion on recursion. (view)
-
04:23Mumuji (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Wait, did I miss something? I didn't hear about blackmailing. Also great you're fine now. (view)
-
03:40ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:ARsygo/Wiki cleanup: It looks like, there's is no comment here... can someone give me more ideas/suggestions? (view)
-
02:26P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? on the article BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Also, you can report the inappropriate blackmail to FANDOM, as you seem to know who sent it. Then FA... (view)
-
01:51ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? on the article BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Thankfully, you're back, I hope that the blackmail won't happen again. (view)
3 July 2021
-
21:19Josewong (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? on the article BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Good Thing That The Person Blackmailing BlankEntity Won't Be Coming Back Anytime So He Can Contribut... (view)
-
13:20ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Let me check the number of digits and put it into the perspective. on the article Samuel2097/Barbogogoog: It looks like, this number is 3,521 digits long. (view)
-
12:27P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... on the article Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: As I wrote above, ordinals are not formal strings. Therefore even "ω+1 gamma symbol" is ill-defined... (view)
-
09:54Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... on the article Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: ... (view)
-
03:34P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? on the article BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Oh, that is too bad... (view)
-
01:00BlankEntity (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? on the article BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Blackmail. I cannot say who, as they have information that I cannot handle going public. (view)
-
00:57BlankEntity (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? on the article BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Blackmail. I cannot say who, or else bad things will happen. They have information that I cannot han... (view)
-
00:52ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/Goodbye (EXPIRED): Why do you leave the Wiki? (is it temporary or permanent)? (view)
-
00:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Which means... can I delete this blog post? on the article DrCeasium/Extended Cascading-E notation: I think that the OP did not require the deletion itself. (view)
2 July 2021
-
10:15ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Samuel2097/Barbogogoog: Let me check the number of digits and put it into the perspective. (view)
-
09:50ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DrCeasium/Extended Cascading-E notation: Which means... can I delete this blog post? (view)
1 July 2021
-
23:53P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:DAno80/Power Array Notation and Power Number: Ill-defined because Common failure 2.1: Use of Ambiguous Ellipses Common failure 6.1: Intuitive Patt... (view)
-
23:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Power Array Notation and Power Number: Ill-defined because Common failure 2.1: Use of Ambiguous Ellipses Comon failure 6.1: Intuitive Patte... (view)
-
22:38ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Okay, deletions of any Andre Joyce numbers currently marked with "Candidates for deletion" will b... on the article Username5243/The Great Wiki Cleanup - The Andre Joycisms: I actually continued it by moving to the archive page without leaving a redirect, since no one turne... (view)
-
21:19BlankEntity (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Vard Number: As pbot stated, this is ill-defined. Also, FOOT is ill-defined and hence isn't a good number to comp... (view)
-
21:05Ynought (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:DAno80/Power Array Notation and Power Number: I would recommend not straight up deleting the last entry when recursing, so instead of (a,b,c) bein... (view)
-
21:04Ynought (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:DAno80/Power Array Notation and Power Number: I would recommend not straight up deleting the last entry when recursing, so instead of (a,b,c) bein... (view)
-
12:23P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Also, maybe many of articles in the category of numbers by Garrett Wilkinson does not seem to hav... on the article Username5243/The Great Wiki Cleanup - The Andre Joycisms: The only user who expressed disagreement with keeping the articles in the category was Plain'N'Simpl... (view)
-
11:24Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Kyodaisuu/Comparison of up-arrow notation with hyper-E notation: Now I updated the theorem and proved it. I appreciate if someone can check the proof. (view)
-
11:13Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Kyodaisuu/Comparison of up-arrow notation with hyper-E notation: Now I updated the theorem and it was proved. I appreciate if someone can check the proof. (view)
-
10:04Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Kyodaisuu/Comparison of up-arrow notation with hyper-E notation: I may change the theorem to a↑↑↑b = E(a)1#1#b after confirmation. (view)
-
10:04ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Also, maybe many of articles in the category of numbers by Garrett Wilkinson does not seem to hav... on the article Username5243/The Great Wiki Cleanup - The Andre Joycisms: Is there any updates regarding it? (view)
-
04:57Darwisyh (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/1000 EDITS: Dont talk to much that just the begining (view)
-
04:56Darwisyh (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Very fast achievement. on the article BlankEntity/1000 EDITS: Crate (view)
30 June 2021
-
07:36ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Username5243/Bowers Updates Again: Is there any updates for the website? (view)
-
00:42ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/1000 EDITS: Congrats on that, I'm actually going for contributing 10,000 edits to this wiki. (Total number of ed... (view)
29 June 2021
-
23:10BlankEntity (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Very fast achievement. on the article BlankEntity/1000 EDITS: Indeed. (view)
-
22:50P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/1000 EDITS: Very fast achievement. (view)
-
07:38P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... on the article Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: > It means that there are gamma naught gammas. First, it does not work, because ordinals and ordinal... (view)
-
07:23Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... on the article Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: It means that there are gamma naught gammas. Does this mean I need to define fundamental sequences f... (view)
28 June 2021
-
15:48BlankEntity (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: @Eryx Jayakari I'm not sure if you have the same issue as Pbot which is English not being your firs... (view)
-
15:29BlankEntity (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: @Eryx Jayakari I'm not sure if you have the same issue as Pbot which is English not being your firs... (view)
-
11:56P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: It does not seem to be "soon". (view)
-
11:35Eryx Jayakari (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-06-24) Policy: Wikia ToS doesn't define harassment either. A simple google search shows that: "Online harassment ma... (view)
-
11:30Eryx Jayakari (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: > "personal attacks" So pointing out why you (and OP) are being wrong is a personal attack. Ah thank... (view)
-
10:17P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: I hope that you will soon notice that what you are doing is not calling out someone's inappropriate ... (view)
-
10:09P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: I hope that you will soon notice that what you are doing is not calling out someone's inappropriate ... (view)
-
10:04P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like the Wiki's browser page is broken. I checked on other wikis within the Fandom network,... on the article C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): I see. (Actually, IE was not supported, but could be used in past days.) (view)
-
10:03P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: I hope that you will soon notice that what you are doing is not calling out someone's inappropriate ... (view)
-
09:47Eryx Jayakari (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/Is this real?: I was being rude? Is saying what's true now considered rude? Calling out someone's inappropriate beh... (view)
-
07:20ARsygo (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like the Wiki's browser page is broken. I checked on other wikis within the Fandom network,... on the article C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): Oh, I see, but recently, Samsung Internet actually supports mobile browsing as well. (note: the brow... (view)
-
06:53P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment It looks like the Wiki's browser page is broken. I checked on other wikis within the Fandom network,... on the article C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): Mobile browsing is supported only for Chrome and Safari. Help:Supported browsers | Community Central... (view)
-
06:52P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like the Wiki's browser page is broken. I checked on other wikis within the Fandom network,... on the article C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): Mobile brousing is supprted only for Chrome and Safari. Help:Supported browsers | Community Central ... (view)
-
06:35ARsygo (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): It looks like the Wiki's browser page is broken. I checked on other wikis within the Fandom network,... (view)
-
04:41P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is it your original function? Then there is no actual source. Seriously, please tell me your triv... on the article Antimony Star/Proposal to make this inaccessible OCF the "standard" OCF: It is good to directly ask professionals working on OA. (I disagree with the too strong claim "surpr... (view)
-
04:23C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Is it your original function? Then there is no actual source. Seriously, please tell me your triv... on the article Antimony Star/Proposal to make this inaccessible OCF the "standard" OCF: I found this comment after a while. I asked on a math Discord and I would like to clarify that ordin... (view)
-
04:06P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... on the article Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: The α-th iteration for α ≧ ω is quite ambiguous, and hence is ill-defined unless the OP specifi... (view)
-
03:55P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... on the article Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: The α-th iteration for α ≧ ω is quite ambiguous, and hence is ill-defined unless you specify th... (view)
-
03:49P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... on the article P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: Although I do not know a written explanation, you can check that for example, the Mostowski collapse... (view)
-
02:37Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0, ... 𝞿(1,0,𝞿(1,0,0)) ... )... (view)
-
02:34Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: (view)
-
02:34Msiajoe74 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: My understanding is: 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_0 = 𝚪_1 𝚪_𝚪_ ... 𝚪_𝚪_1 = 𝚪_2 And so ... (view)
-
02:29C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... on the article P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: > it is not an analogue of Mostowski collapsing any more. On this topic, I asked about how OCFs and ... (view)
-
02:19P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... on the article P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: > they will remain in use forever, never surpassed by any novel concepts? Perhaps you are missing th... (view)
-
02:17ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:C7X/Wikia style changes (temporary post): It looks like the Wiki's browser page is broken. I checked on other wikis within the Fandom network,... (view)
27 June 2021
-
23:45C7X (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... (view)
-
23:44C7X (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... (view)
-
23:44C7X (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... (view)
-
23:40C7X (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:P進大好きbot/Relation between an OCF and an Ordinal Notation: When transfinite ordinals were a very new concept, Cantor essentially paved the path toward a descri... (view)
-
16:05BlankEntity (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment What is the planned growth rate of this function? on the article BlankEntity/Blank's Graham Generator Function (BGGF): C7X said what the growth rate was in the last reply of the previous comment. (view)
-
16:05BlankEntity (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What is the planned growth rate of this function? on the article BlankEntity/Blank's Graham Generator Function (BGGF): C7X said what the growth rate was in the previous comment. (view)
-
14:37Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: Right. (view)
-
14:20P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: Thank you for giving this log. (view)
-
13:49Eryx Jayakari (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: I'm 3 days late but thanks to your persistent replies: No, you have not been harassed. If you feel l... (view)
-
13:42P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: I think that a sentence including "Maybe" is not usually dealt with as a statement, because it inclu... (view)
-
13:25Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) edited a reply to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: Maybe it is a conjecture without rigorous proof. (This statement is also a conjecture without proof.... (view)
-
13:24Kyodaisuu (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: Maybe it is a conjecture without rigorous proof. (view)
-
13:05P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Infinite sub ordinals: As I explained, what you need is not fundamental sequences for Gammas, but the system of fundamental... (view)
-
11:15P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: Perhaps the "are" should be "is", if my belief that Hexirp is a single person is correct. (view)
-
11:00Koteitan (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: Not only that but also how did you find that discord user yukito is googologist yukito. 5. Hexirp ar... (view)
-
10:51P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: I list possible cases: ゆきとtold Hexirp. Yukito told Hexirp. Hexirp personally knew ゆきと an... (view)
-
10:49Koteitan (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Hexirp/(2021-06-27) Yukito is not Yukito.: Yukito is not a googologist Yukito How did you find it? (view)
-
08:45P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Accusation of personal behavior with serious evidence is not a personal attack. on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: The point is that the "evidences" are not serious, as I explained the reason why they are not eviden... (view)
-
08:36Cloudy176 (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/Is this real?: Accusation of personal behavior with serious evidence is not a personal attack. (view)
-
07:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: @Eryx Jayakari Thanks to C7X, I find a way to ask you a question: "I perceive YtoSK's messages as ha... (view)
-
05:20P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What are \(\Theta\text{ and } \Phi\)?I'm sorry if you defined it in this post but could now find it. on the article P進大好きbot/FGH beyond PTO(ZFC): > Consider a possibility: ZFC is not consistent. then your notation is also wrong. No. I clarfied in... (view)
-
04:40ReflectingOrdinal (talk | contribs) replied to the comment What are \(\Theta\text{ and } \Phi\)?I'm sorry if you defined it in this post but could now find it. on the article P進大好きbot/FGH beyond PTO(ZFC): Consider a possibility: ZFC is not consistent. then your notation is also wrong. A good notation sho... (view)
-
03:33P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: > it came after a message explaining how the mod team sees your harassment claims as unjustified, th... (view)
-
02:58C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: > In that case, how should I ask it? The issue with the statement "why you are allowing those users ... (view)
-
02:11BlankEntity (talk | contribs) replied to the comment Oh, have you moved the blog post? It is bad, because then feedbacks will be invisible. At least, you... on the article BlankEntity/Hyper-B notation: I removed the redirect on Expansion notation finally instead of constantly procrastinating. (view)
-
01:11P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The definition of the system of fundamental sequences for a notation assiciated to Buchholz's functi... on the article Mumuji/Fundamental Sequences: I see. By the way, the OCF itself is very difficult to understand, because it is uncomplutable and r... (view)
-
01:07Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment The definition of the system of fundamental sequences for a notation assiciated to Buchholz's functi... on the article Mumuji/Fundamental Sequences: I don't really know, but I was just wondering. Oh well, you can ignore it. (view)
-
00:54P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) edited a comment on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Fundamental Sequences: The definition of the system of fundamental sequences for a notation assiciated to Buchholz's functi... (view)
-
00:53P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:Mumuji/Fundamental Sequences: The definition of the system of fundamental sequences extended to "Extended Buchholz's function" giv... (view)
-
00:53Mumuji (talk | contribs) replied to the comment One more thing, if I say 999....... once every second, considering I am immortal, in an infinite tim... on the article Msiajoe74/T6- The Largest Number in Existence: Basically that. In an infinite amount of time, there will be infinite 9s, meaning it is a infinity d... (view)
-
00:51P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: @C7X > "why you are allowing those users to harass others?" is a loaded question. In that case, how ... (view)
-
00:43P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: I did not know whether you are a mathematician or not, but I got interested in the wording "that are... (view)
-
00:38P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like... I also don't want to involve with drama, as it only gets worse. on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: @BlankEntity By the way, if you find my rude comments, then I appreciate the feedback because being ... (view)
-
00:33P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment It looks like... I also don't want to involve with drama, as it only gets worse. on the article BlankEntity/Is this real?: To BlankEntity and ARsygo I am sorry that this happens. I am persuading C7X. At least, this communit... (view)
-
00:14ARsygo (talk | contribs) commented on the article User_blog:BlankEntity/Is this real?: It looks like... I also don't want to involve with drama, as it only gets worse. (view)
26 June 2021
-
21:58C7X (talk | contribs) replied to the comment I agree that we should make sure that we should not consider outside activity of this community as a... on the article Hexirp/(2021-06-23) Blocking: > it is really dishonest to label me to be maniplating C7X. I'm quite honestly starting to agree wit... (view)
-
16:27Tetramur (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article Tetramur/Projective linear groups and Fermat's numbers: > I am not certain why you think so. Not difficult to explain. I think so because I'm not a professi... (view)
-
15:41P進大好きbot (talk | contribs) replied to the comment How great you are to find the unsolved problem by yourself! on the article