(Adding up-arrow expression) Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''Octal-Googoltrex''' is equal to 8[3]8[1]100 using [[Username5243's Array Notation]].<ref>{{cite web|first=|last=Username5243|url=https://sites.google.com/site/mylargenumbers/numbers/unan/p1|title=Part 1|work=My Large Numbers|accessdate=2017-03-18}}</ref> It is equal to \(8\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 8\uparrow100\) using [[arrow notation]]. The term was coined by Wikia user [[User:Username5243|Username5243]]. |
|
== Sources == |
== Sources == |
||
<references /> |
<references /> |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Category:Up-arrow notation level]] |
[[Category:Up-arrow notation level]] |
||
[[Category:Powers of 2]] |
[[Category:Powers of 2]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Googol series]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Toogol Regiment]] |
Revision as of 19:11, 27 February 2021
Octal-Googoltrex is equal to 8[3]8[1]100 using Username5243's Array Notation.[1] It is equal to \(8\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 8\uparrow100\) using arrow notation. The term was coined by Wikia user Username5243.
Sources
Megoogol · Meg-Googol · Meg-Doogol · Meg-Kiloogol · Meg-Kil-Googol · Meg-Dukiloogol · Meg-Trukiloogol · Dumegoogol · Dumeg-Googol · Dumeg-Kiloogol · Dumeg-Dukiloogol · Trumegoogol · Trumeg-Kiloogol · Tetrumegoogol · Pentumegoogol · Gigoogol · Gig-Googol · Gig-Kiloogol · Gig-Megoogol · Dugigoogol · Trugigoogol · Teroogol · Duteroogol · Truteroogol · Petoogol · Ectoogol · Zettoogol · Yottoogol · Xennoogol · Wekoogol
Note: The readers should be careful that numbers defined by Username5243's Array Notation are ill-defined as explained in Username5243's Array Notation#Issues. So, when an article refers to a number defined by the notation, it actually refers to an intended value, not an actual value itself (for example, a[c]b = \(a \uparrow^c b\) in arrow notation). In addition, even if the notation is ill-defined, a class category should be based on an intended value when listed, not an actual value itself, as it is not hard to fix all the issues from the original definition, hence it should not be removed.