Those numbers, along with "nested Cascading-E numbers" and "expand-E numbers", have no source now, since Aarex's old website closed, and they didn't move to the new site. Should we delete them? {hyp/^,cos} (talk) 15:49, August 24, 2016 (UTC)
I think Cloudy told me once that sources not existing wasn't a valid reason to delete things. And I also remember one time someone marked one of them for deletion and it got reverted. So unless someone really wants to, I say keep them for now. Username5243 (talk) 15:58, August 24, 2016 (UTC)
Just asked Cloudy176 on Discord. He said they should be kept for historical purposes. So, let them be. Username5243 (talk) 16:01, August 24, 2016 (UTC)
- To be pedantic, pages whose sources no longer existing should not be deleted for that reason, unlike articles whose off-site sources did not ever exist (such as the majority of the articles created in the made-up number era). -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 16:03, August 24, 2016 (UTC)
- I will move all the names in my old site to new and remame it, like Grahal renamed to Granhal. AarexWikia04 - 16:36, August 24, 2016 (UTC)