↑G. Takeuti. Ordinal diagrams. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 9.4 (1957): 386-394.
↑G. Takeuti, Ordinal diagrams II, J. Math. Soc. Japan 12(1960), 385-391.
↑ G. Takeuti, On the fundamental conjecture of GLC V, J. Math. Soc. Japan 10(1958), 121-134
↑G. Takeuti, On the fundamental conjecture of GLC VI, Proc. Japan
Acad. 37(1961), 440-443.
↑G. Takeuti, Consistency proofs of subsystems of classical analysis, Annals of Mathematics (2) vol.86, 299–348 (1967).
↑G. Takeuti. and M. Yasugi, The ordinals of the systems of second order arithmetic with the provably -comprehension axiom and with the -comprehension axiom respectively”, Japanese Journal of Mathematics vol.41, 1-67 (1973).
↑H. Levitz. On the Relationship Between Takeuti's Ordinal Diagrams and Schütte's System of Ordinal Notations . Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. 60. Elsevier, 1970. 377-405.
↑M. Okada. A simple relationship between Buchholz's new system of ordinal notations and Takeuti's system of ordinal diagrams. The Journal of symbolic logic 52.3 (1987): 577-581.
↑T. Arai. Ordinal diagrams for recursively Mahlo universes. Archive for Mathematical Logic 39.5 (2000): 353-391.
↑T. Arai. Ordinal diagrams for -reflection. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 65.3 (2000): 1375-1394.
↑T. Arai. Proof theory for theories of ordinals—I: recursively Mahlo ordinals. Annals of Pure and applied Logic 122.1-3 (2003): 1-85.
↑T. Arai. Proof theory for theories of ordinals II: -reflection. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 129.1-3 (2004): 39-92.
↑T. Arai. Proof Theory for Theories of Ordinals III: -Reflection. Gentzen's Centenary. Springer, Cham, 2015. 357-424.
↑T. Arai. Wellfoundedness Proofs by Means of Non-Monotonic Inductive Definitions I: -Operators. Journal of Symbolic Logic (2004): 830-850.
↑T. Arai. Wellfoundedness proofs by means of non-monotonic inductive definitions II: first order operators. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162.2 (2010): 107-143.
↑T. Arai. A Sneak Preview of Proof Theory of Ordinals (< Special Section> Infinity in Philosophy and Mathematics). Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 20 (2012): 29-47.