User blog comment:Superman37891/PARKER WOLF THE HULK/@comment-30754445-20170609112214

Do you know how to write numbers in scientific notation?

You could add 1 to all the entries, and get a nearly identical number which is far more elegant:

(1016,1016, ... with 1018 (1016)'s)10124

Also, having these big numbers inside this long array is kinda pointless, because the only number that really matters is the last one. Case in point:

(2,2,2)100 is much much bigger than (9999,9999,9999 ... with a googol 9999's)99.

And similarly:

(2,2,2)10124 is (a teeny-bit) bigger than your original number.

So if you intend to make "the largest number possible" with your notation, you should concentrate only on increasing the last number.

By the way, your number (as well as suggestions) can be approximated in my letter notation as:

JE124

The "124" is because your final number has 124 9's. Note that none of the other numbers in your definition appear in my approximation, which proves - again - that they have pretty much no effect on the final number's size.