User blog comment:Ecl1psed276/BM2 Analysis - A Summary/@comment-30754445-20180709051740/@comment-35870936-20180711032046

My responses to each of your paragraphs are below:

>>> Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Ask Nish to write a blog post with the analysis. He's done quite a bit of analysis on a ton of things on discord. I haven't done too much analysis myself actually. And you should definitely join discord so you can be in the loop in all of this.

>>> What do you mean, "the siutation"? There is literally no situation here, other than you getting upset about people simplifying things and preferring not to use math that only high level college/university students will understand. There are plenty of people in the googology community who aren't even graduated high school yet. Lay off. See my next point for why it doesn't matter that we use the "actual" math.

>>> You don't need to understand exactly how compact cardinals are defined in set theory. You don't even need to know even a little bit how they are defined. The only thing that matters to us googologists is how it works in ordinal collapsing functions. I used UNOCF in this analysis. UNOCF is very simple, you don't need to study grad level set theory for 3 years to understand UNOCF. I learned it in about 1 day when I first saw it.

>>> lol, stop being so butthurt. It isn't a problem. You can do the "actual" math if you want, but everyone else will work on actually making it understandable to 90% of the community.