User blog comment:Wythagoras/All my stuff/@comment-10429372-20130718073726/@comment-1605058-20130718083555

I understand why ¥ function may not be well defined, but I completely don't get point with z(n) function. Because of no restrictions, z(n) may not take values, so "the output of z(1000), where z(n) is the largest number definable in 2n+3 symbols of English." probably is undefined, so doesn't name any number. Thus it has nothing to do with ¥.

Every integer is finite, so non infinite integers are exactly integers. So Hollom's number would be largest integer, and I hope I don't have to explain why this sounds absurdally.