User blog comment:Rpakr/Reforms 2/@comment-5150073-20190909115744/@comment-35470197-20190914232444

> On the other hand, there's nothing to prevent admins from deleting whatever excess garbage the believe is unfit to be on the wiki. Doing so doesn't break any written rule either, because right now there are no such rules - either way.

What do you think about section 4(c) of CC-BY-SA license? It forces users to keep credit of original authors. Usually, the credit is automatically given by the history page, but the same does not hold for the copy/delete of articles. Remember that CC-BY-SA does not force authors to abandon our copyright or freedom of speech. So even though this is a wiki, we need to respect author's human right.

For example, wikipedia assumes users to clarify credit of original authors of deleted articles in a non-automatic way, because it follows both CC-BY-SA and GFDL. (I know that this wiki is not wikipedia, but I believe that how wikipedia work under the license is remarkable.)

> A wiki mainspace is not a stage for public speaking where anything goes. Sorry, but that's not how wikis work.

If I correctly understand freedom of speech, it is a right applicable to any speech. Of course, it is not absolute and is restricted by [harm principal]. For example, deletion of articles violating written agreed-upon rules does not violate this right. But I do not know a restriction due to a condition such as "this is not a stage for public speaking". Although the restriction of human rights partially depends on local laws, could you kindly tell me a source which tells me why the restriction is appropriate instead of blaming me like "Huh"?

> Nobody here ever claimed that blog posts are always good sources.

> The solution is to create quality guidelines that actually make sense, and to apply these guidelines equally on internal and external sources.

Then it is good to hear that. I was afraid of that, because when I put "candidate for deletion" tag, people (not only original authors but also others) remove the tag without any argument or changing the rule on the existence of external sources.