Forum:Weary wombat function

According to http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~jah/busybeaver/, the weary wombat is defined as following:


 * [...] we denote this function as the weary wombat, or ww(n), which is the minimum number of state transitions made by a terminating machine which prints n 1's.

Isn't ww(n) equal to n as it is currently defined? If so, should we consider wwm(n) to be the minimum number of state transitions made by an m-state terminating machine which prints n 1's, and then define ww(n)=wwpp(n)(n)? Wythagoras (talk) 08:09, November 1, 2015 (UTC)