User blog comment:Emlightened/We have more numbers than pages./@comment-28606698-20170808192559/@comment-27513631-20170810160845

Not too sure about BEAF numbers either - unless we separate by the length of the array/separators used in the array, and put the undefined numbers on a page of their own.

Possibly also HAN and SAN (and BEAF up to \(\varepsilon_0\)). HAN has some numbers (like Nucleabixul possibly (I'm unfamiliar with HAN and there's no comparison on the page)) which are beyond the strength of BAN, so at least it would be compared to SAN and not just ordinals. HH may be redundant, as for most used \(\geq \varepsilon_0\) growth rates FGH and HH are approximately equal, and this would also eventually happen to SGH beyond \(\vartheta(\Omega_\omega\). Perhaps they are only included in the lower levels or similar?

Also, List of Systems of Fundamental Sequences is now a thing for FGH comparisons.