User blog comment:PsiCubed2/Are We Inadvertently Encouraging Salad Numbers?/@comment-24920136-20170607153809

1.- Thats something i've been mildly annoyed by for a while, but more so recently. Thousands upon thousands of pages for single numbers with no other mention or use anywhere outside their page. Why?, Sure, *making* tons of numbers up is fun, but whats the benefit of each having their own page?

Proposed fix:, we can have table pages with groups of hundreds or thousands of numbers on them, thus greatly reducing the clutter.

2.-  This could be solved through linking to the appropiate explanation page but, see 1, the labor would be manual and titanic

3.- This seems like a continuation of 2 though also valid

4.- This is a very solid complaint. I agree and heres my proposed fix, Approximations should be presented with some reasonable effort to prove the approximation claim is true. Wether its some laymanly steps or a rigorous proof could stand to vote but, whatever is chosen should be better than nothing. If concensus is reached on this, all approximations that are unjustified should be deleted, but again, before my proposed fix #1, this labor would be time consuming at a non-trivial scale

5.- Guides could solve this

6.- My proposal #1  could alleviate this.