User blog comment:Syst3ms/STON 2 : BMS and the Star/@comment-33713741-20190904131346/@comment-39541634-20190904135037

Yeah, messy is good in this context.

Indeed, if anything, it looks too simple to do the job it is intended to do.

And the same is true for BMS itself, by the way. I have no idea why so many people believe that (0,0,0)(1,1,1)(2,2,2) terminates when they don't have any justification for that claim. Or is there a justification which I'm not aware of?