User blog comment:Simplicityaboveall/Insanely Fast-Growing Functions & Large Numbers - A Simple Construction/@comment-35470197-20181212123413/@comment-35470197-20181215141222

Oh... Why could you state that I did not understand properly your work before you understand properly my comment on your ill-defineness?

Please write down the computation of \(f_{t+2}(3)\) and \(f_{t+1}(1)\) using equality 1 by clearly declaring what you substituted for \(k\) and \(n\) in the equality. (In the computation, please do not use any alternative rule which you did not declare in your blog post.)