User blog comment:Vel!/Ultracardinals/@comment-1605058-20140619213312

When I first saw this blog post, I thought it was legit, although I was surprised FBZ found concept deserving the name "ultracardinals" (no offence here). When I saw first line of post, I knew it wasn't totally legit.

When looking at definition, I figured out this definition works as something (actually, if we interpret exponentiation as cardinal arithmetic, weak ultracardinals are exactly strong inaccessibles, and it's equiconsistent that there is only one such cardinal, thus being ultracardinal). I knew that claims about Reinhardt cardinals was either a really bad mistake, or troll. Claim about axiom of extensionality was total troll. Also, you claimed that sentence provable from ZF is inconsistent with ZF, which really is trolly claim.

Also, psi function is constant beyond its limit, so it always retrurns value.

I won't even mention super-hyper-extra-ultracardinals, fact that Aarex seems to not get the joke, and that FBZ (jokingly) found his ideas good.