User blog comment:Vel!/Re: Rayo's function/@comment-25593348-20141121014944/@comment-2033667-20141121020957


 * The discernable difference between the iota function and my number, other than one being a number while the other being a function, is the concept of having every physical answer. It is, in a sense, a more determinable number as opposed to a function, and the function only uses addition. So, at the end of the day, it is a discernable number, and the technical function of it is this, in temporal notation.

Not what I was getting at. The problem is that both functions ultimately rely on the idea of ideation -- that they derive from concepts that must be written down, thought about, whatever -- which is an inherently nonmathematical concept. Mathematical objects cannot depend on nonmathematical objects.