User talk:Ikosarakt1/Archive 2

Current talk page.

Refreshing and purging
Refreshing and purging are different. Refreshing simply reloads the page from the server cache, while purging refreshes the server cache and forces the most recent revision to appear. &#9729; I want more clouds! &#9925; 13:10, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't know such niceties. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:29, June 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * And this is why IPs get a confirmation message when they try to purge. If it didn't, then it could be misused for DDoS attacks. -- &#9729; I want more clouds! &#9925; 13:31, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * So, must I keep it here or remove it? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:44, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Jiawhien (talk) 04:51, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

hecatonicosihexapentacosiheptacontihexaexon
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=579318135442463&set=a.385472318160380.91481.207201309320816&type=1&relevant_count=1, what dimension is this? Jiawhien (talk) 04:51, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Just 2nd, since there is no -ract suffix. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 09:02, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

It's a 7-dimensional polytope with 126576(?) 6-dimensional cells. 73.235.194.108 14:44, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Page
Can find any source and put some content into this wiki? remember to check "previous page" and "next page" too.
 * It is actually can be a source, we don't need to find it. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 09:09, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Image
I think you get the image from http://www.catonmat.net/blog/busy-beaver, am i smart to find out? Jiawhien (talk) 10:52, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I got these images from there. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:03, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Yllion
Shall we remain the

Number Navigator
Previous: nonyllion Next: undecyllion

or Use Template:

Number Navigator
Jiawhien (talk) 03:17, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

And should we \(10^{2^{17}}=10^{131072}\) or \(10^{2^{17}} = 10^{131072}\)? And the diffrences of these 2 is the 1st one does not have space between the equal sign and the 2nd one have the space bar between the equal sign. Check the source, got a tiny differences. Jiawhien (talk) 03:26, June 10, 2013 (UTC)


 * I think, in both cases, the latter would be better. — ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 03:53, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * You chose the second one, so now, ikosarakt shall respond too. Jiawhien (talk) 04:01, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * For the first, we must use template, as it more compact. As for second, there is no big matter which one we shall use. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 12:01, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

Age
if not secret you are 16 years old?(Konkhra talk) 11:19, June 13, 2013 (UTC).
 * Actually I'm 15. Whence you guess that I'm 16? Also, how old are you? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:42, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm 19, you wrote about 500 000 000 seconds your life. it's about 16 :-) Konkhra (talk) 09:39, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

Number
Shall i put aarex numbers to this wiki? like Terribegocal? like i added meameamealokkapoowa bipoowa in this wiki, so shall we add the rest? 220.255.2.98 12:14, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, and don't forget to add the sources. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 12:15, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, that will be a lot of things. 220.255.2.174 12:17, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

So, you know which forcal number surpasses the chained level? Jiawheein (talk) 13:30, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * I guess that there are no number based on forcal and that can go beyond {a,b,c,d}. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 17:25, June 15, 2013 (UTC)

Ahh, there is more forcal numbers, i am tired of it, someone add instead. JiawheinGoogol (talk) 10:49, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

And, there is another aarex site, is https://sites.google.com/site/mybeaf/home. JiawheinGoogol (talk) 10:49, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Main page
Can you unprotect it for few hours and protect again? because i have to edit. JiawheinGoogol (talk) 10:36, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

I unprotected it, but I shall look at your edits on that. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 10:49, June 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * Done. JiawheinGoogol (talk) 10:57, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

cube using the laptop/computer
I ask you a thing, since you are a hypercube, then how are you using the keyboard (a cube using.). Jiawheein (talk) 12:15, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Using the magic spells. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 12:22, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

I guess he uses one of his 3-dimensional embeddings to coexist with us AND use keyboard. LittlePeng9 (talk) 12:44, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

aarexes
His other site is https://sites.google.com/site/mybeaf/home

and

shall we also put the numbers from

https://sites.google.com/site/aarexnumbers/home/full-book, https://sites.google.com/site/aarexnumbers/home/flo2i, https://sites.google.com/site/aarexnumbers/home/asei, https://sites.google.com/site/aarexnumbers/home/mega, https://sites.google.com/site/aarexnumbers/hyperop, https://sites.google.com/site/aarexnumbers/aan ? JiawheinGoogol (talk) 11:50, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, Aarex's numbers are notable for us. We must add all them. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:55, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

You shall check the spellings of the nested hyper e numbers. JiawheinGoogol (talk) 12:54, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

No misspellings. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:00, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

Now, check (patrol) his illion numbers. IAmJiawhein (talk) 11:37, June 26, 2013 (UTC) And, add which class is that. IAmJiawhein (talk) 11:43, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

Do we have to remove the Numbers by aarex tiaokhiao category like Vigintillion, Centillion and some other numbers in the source? Because the numbers centillion 10^300 is coined by aarex while not 10^303. IAmJiawhein (talk) 13:17, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, we must remove it because their names weren't coined by him. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:22, June 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Done, i have finished the aarex endleek illions. IAmJiawhein (talk) 13:50, June 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Good work. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 15:37, June 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I donno the class of the Vamossol numbers so, you add. 220.255.1.139 13:03, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Your picture is in Meganossol. 220.255.1.119 05:44, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

IP
Unblock the whole 220.255.1.XX because i left my this ip to contribute or i may not be able to edit anymore. IAmJW (talk) 04:11, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * I can't unblock the staff-typed block. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 09:32, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * I unblocked the local one. Is there a global block left? -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 10:03, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, actually is the local one and the major problem is my accounts keep getting disabled. 220.255.1.169 12:33, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * If i cannot edit the wiki for few days, that means that i am blocked completely. 220.255.1.113 13:22, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have sent a message to Wikia, regarding about giving you a second chance. Hope this helps! -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 13:02, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * If got second chance, then i stop using profanity at the ip 207.159.196.253 But if not, then i will do this and spread very fast. 220.255.1.113 13:22, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * But you hate Wikia? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:56, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Spefic people. 220.255.1.139 04:10, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

And I got a response for my message from Wikia. It says: Brandon Rhea, Jun 27 02:35 pm (UTC): Hello,

Thanks for contacting Wikia. Global blocks are between Wikia and blocked users, and it is our policy not to discuss them with third parties.

Best regards,

Brandon Rhea Wikia Community Support

Cloudy 17, Jun 27 12:53 pm (UTC): On Googology Wiki (http://googology.wikia.com), Jiawhein is creating many alternative accounts to evade account disabling. He does constructive edits on this wiki, minus a few harassments.

So please give Jiawhein a second chance. Tell him to not harass people again, and stop disabling his accounts.

Thanks, Cloudy So, unfortunately, I cannot do anything about Jiawhein's global block. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 05:24, June 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * So, is it stop disable and unblock the ip? 220.255.1.117 05:32, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

FB100Z
He has not been editing this wiki for few whole days, so is he dead already? 220.255.1.170 12:38, June 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Looks like you forgot this. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 12:41, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * He can still edit in europe... 220.255.1.149 12:59, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * You so worry about his Wiki Life badge? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:13, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Not really, but he is an beruauct and the founder. 220.255.1.144 13:24, June 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * But it doesn't mean he can't have a break from this wiki. He deserves it. LittlePeng9 (talk) 13:59, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh hey guys, what's up? FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 23:09, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * As for editing in Europe: I couldn't. I chose not to bring any electronic devices (I needed a break from the Internets) and the wifi in Italian hotels is pretty crappy anyway. FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 23:11, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * I can't afford to delay a day in GWiki since I want to get "A Wiki Hero!" badge. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 17:50, July 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * And you finally did it! Congratulations! I hope to be 2nd one to get that badge :) LittlePeng9 (talk) 16:24, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I wish you a good luck. If you can edit from mobile, then you definitely shall not have problems with it. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 16:29, October 21, 2013 (UTC)

BEAN
Was it really necessary to go changing everything from BEAF to BEAN? FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 14:38, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

The matter of BEAF and BEAN are different. BEAF is a function that use three informal rules and definitions described on multiple pages on Bowers' site. It is supposed to handle and solve any structure, even such as EX##X or SCG(X). It just uses the fact that the number of entries in the array can be computed turning all X's to p's in it, e.g. SCG(X) & 3 will have SCG(3) entries.

Since BEAF need some structures, some notations for it must be invented. So, BEAN is a couple of notations that Bowers' made just to indicate some structures. When we write {3,3,3,3}, it is BEAN, but must be solved with BEAF. So, I made the changes. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 15:15, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

But Bowers defined his numbers in BEAF, not in BEAN. BEAN isn't something that Bowers defined. I think we should use BEAF, until Bowers defines SCG(X)&3 or something. Wythagoras (talk) 15:25, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

This site differs BEAN and BEAF by the way. The limit of BEAN is below Church-Kleene ordinal (as Bowers didn't define non-recursive notations), while BEAF is virtually unlimited to-extend (order type \(\omega_1\), which measures the limit of countable structures in principle). Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 15:34, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Bowers said: this numbers will discribed with my Exploding Array Function here Wythagoras (talk) 16:14, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

The distinction between BEAN and BEAF is complicated and confusing to readers. Why not just keep it simple and just use the name Bowers did? FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 16:35, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Please stop with changing BEAF to BEAN until we have maked a decision. Wythagoras (talk) 18:16, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, so I must write "BEAN" only in my sub-space. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 18:24, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, not in the articles, I think, until we have maked a decision. Wythagoras (talk) 18:30, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Logue pages
Look at my fixed approxmations please, you are making mistakes. Wythagoras (talk) 18:43, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, the mistake is one term in a power tower. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 18:46, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Also a mistake in HAN: 16!2 should be 17!1 for example Wythagoras (talk) 18:47, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I just rushed myself to get more edits. I shall be more accurate further. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 18:53, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

You make the same mistake again: by Hardy and FGH one term. f_4(5) should be f_4(4) for example. Wythagoras (talk) 16:04, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

I shall fix these mistakes after next patrolling. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 16:07, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

500000000
On my birthday you wrote on 8th of July you'll hit your half-billionth second. Coincidentally, today I visited my talk page and saw this. So congratulations! I have to check when my half-billion mark will be. LittlePeng9 (talk) 20:05, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

Happy half-billionth second! I hit mine way back in January. FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 21:08, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. More exactly, I hit it at 15:33:20 (By the Russian time). Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 06:12, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Happy 50 googolth tritento-second :-D Wythagoras (talk) 08:39, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I wonder if units below Planckian exist. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 08:42, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Sourceless pages from the Made-up Era
I found a load of sourceless pages, almost all pages here are sourceless. ( source is about 100-150 bytes ) These are all stupid pages like giggollakhplex. We should delete them, or ask Aarex to put them on his site. Wythagoras (talk) 10:49, July 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Why don't just use Special:ShortPages? -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 12:16, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Let Aarex will get these names on his site. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:01, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Aarex has made these numbers Wythagoras (talk) 11:04, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

He just put names on these numbers. He can't made a number because it's an abstraction. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:11, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

What??? Wythagoras (talk) 11:26, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

All numbers are abstract, that means they exist even if they were not discovered and/or named. I recommend you a video "Do numbers EXIST?" by the way. LittlePeng9 (talk) 11:45, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Get it, of course do numbers exist  :-)  Wythagoras (talk) 13:17, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

I'm rather platonist, so I believe numbers exist, but "of course" part suggests you can prove this. I'm waiting for your proof :) LittlePeng9 (talk) 13:24, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Category 3 entry linear
the logue numbers belong in this category, because they can be expressed as {a,b,c} in BEAF. Wythagoras (talk) 13:09, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

They weren't defined with 3 entrical BEAN. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:36, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

But they can be expressed as {a,b,c} in BEAF/BEAN. for example ogdatalogue = {10,80,2} Wythagoras (talk) 13:45, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

But three-entry linear gives the same outputs as Chained-arrow notation.Boboris02 (talk) 17:12, October 26, 2016 (UTC)

Your edits last time
Something strange happens after your edits: the headings are ===Something=== and hyperlinks are Something and some of the text

is in code/formatted Please look what went wrong. Wythagoras (talk) 18:35, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

It is important! look what you have done to the grangolgong page! Wythagoras (talk) 18:43, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

It still happens. Please look to your talk page! Wythagoras (talk) 14:29, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for spamming your talk page, but it still happens. Wythagoras (talk) 18:57, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

When I edited from the mobile, I got technical difficulties, but now I can see the problem. This built-in browser removes "Enters" from each line and the text starts to look awkward. Moreover, there are pretty small number of bytes for which I can deal, so in big articles the part of text just cuts. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 12:08, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

When you edit in source mode (on mobile only source is available) you have to make 2 Enters to go down, otherwise it will be ignored. This may be part of a problem. LittlePeng9 (talk) 12:17, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I know, but with Enters the strings escape some window and if it happens, some content loses and I save the page without it. Also, the edit action was unavailable and I used "?action=edit" in order to get the edit page. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 17:20, August 8, 2013 (UTC)

Стасплекс
Is it "Stasplex" in English (or any other language which uses Latin alphabet)? Wythagoras (talk) 18:40, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, read it like that. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 19:32, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've put it in the article. Should we create category "Asian Googolisms" or something? Since there are now 7 Asian Googolisms. Wythagoras (talk) 06:50, August 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) The name of the number was coined in Moscow I believe (since the author works there), and the Moscow is in Europe.
 * 2) As for category, yes, we need it. But Stasplex mustn't lie in this category.
 * 3) Also, "googologism", not "googolism". Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 10:15, August 25, 2013 (UTC)

Jiawhein is still working for us
Since the block of his IP range on June 28, Jiawhein is still working on googology, using his user page on Wikipedia:. What do you think about it? -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 06:52, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * He very much loves googology! Konkhra (talk) 07:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, he is definitely an addicted googologist like me. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 08:55, September 7, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not addicted to googology anymore, but I hope to still be a part of this community. LittlePeng9 (talk) 13:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)

hello!
I am back! It's jiawhein, real not fake, my block is over so staff no block, i am back, however I am busy, like revising for my test, means I shall be back in this wiki in a month or two. I dislike the ip 207... Due to SS. But anyways it's nice to see you again. The block expired in 28-9. 220.255.2.108 09:00, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

And can you undelete jiawhien? Thanks. 220.255.2.145 09:03, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome back! I restored your page. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 10:02, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the restore. I am semi active. I shall now move the wikipedia content in my wikipedia userpage to the unexisted pages. And i shall re create account soon. 220.255.2.99 10:19, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Leisure
mine is estp, what is yours? http://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test JiawhienIsBackNoEvadeBlockOnceAgainIComeBack (talk) 09:14, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

Exact values
In my opinion, a header "Approximation or exact value" doesn't sound well. My idea is to leave this as "Approximation" and simply write "(exact value)" after approximation if two numbers equal (after all, number is its own approximation to infinite precision). LittlePeng9 (talk) 20:34, October 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can do it if you so want. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 21:41, October 16, 2013 (UTC)

Question
Hello, Iko. I know I've made a page about my googology, but can I make some of it a real page? I mean, most of the numbers on here are made up, I think. I'm sorry if this a stupid question, I'm just new here. :P

Hey pal, you just blew in from stupid town? Talk page   15:49, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello, SpongeTechX. No, you are not allowed to place your ideas in the main space by our general politics if they have no external references. You can, however, create a site for your googology and this will be such reference. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 18:05, October 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Can it be a link to another wiki?
 * Hey pal, you just blew in from stupid town? Talk page   18:36, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I believe so. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 20:15, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, we'd much prefer a "permanent" source. Saibian, Hollom, and Tiaokhiao all use Google Sites, try going with that. FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 20:44, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Could I use this as a source for my page?
 * Yes, that's what FB100Z mean. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 07:06, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

Googolbibang
Googolbibang is the same number as googoldubang, can you redirect googolbibang to googoldubang? I need an admin for that. Wythagoras (talk) 15:20, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Googleaarex already done that, and you haven't necessarily be an admin. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 15:26, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Growth rate
Hi, Iko. Вы мне довольно давно отвечали про разницу между темпом роста \(f_{\omega_2^\text{CK}}(n)\) and \(f_{\omega_1^\text{CK}}(n)\). Можно ли сказать что в гугологическом смысле что \(f_{\omega_2^\text{CK}}(n)\) имеет темп роста больше чем \(f_{\omega_1^\text{CK}}(n)\) в такой же мере как \(f_{\omega_1^\text{CK}}(n)\) больше чем \(f_1(n)\)?Konkhra (talk) 11:14, December 7, 2014 (UTC)


 * \(f_{\omega_2^\text{CK}}(n)\) is undefined. LittlePeng9 (talk) 11:32, December 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Темп роста не имеет никакой размерности, так что вопрос некорректен. И да, $$f_{\omega_2^\text{CK}}$$ не определено впринципе. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 13:38, December 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * @peng It's defined if you can develop a fundamental sequence system for it. it's vel time 19:24, December 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course, but afaik, there is no single system which was chosen for this purpose, which is why I said it's undefined. Maybe I should've said "not well-defined" or something. LittlePeng9 (talk) 19:33, December 7, 2014 (UTC)

Site
Nice job! I should visit it more often. Wythagoras (talk) 17:24, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 04:32, March 6, 2015 (UTC)


 * I found a small mistake; on your list of functions, you have f(2,n) between n^^B and n^^log n, which is wrong. Everything else looks great though. Wythagoras (talk) 08:33, March 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, fixed. Since I don't know where exactly is should be placed, I removed it. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 12:21, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

how much does the 365 badge give


 * It gives 250 points. Also, Ikosarakt1 is inactive right now, you should've probably asked somebody else. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 02:03, August 19, 2016 (UTC)

New category
Should we add a new category...Godgahlah series?

There are too many of them to not be considered a group.Boboris02 (talk) 17:30, October 26, 2016 (UTC)

Troll page
http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/KKK Hit (talk) 19:36, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

Profile page
W-why is the 8th site about male's private parts ? Unknown95387 (talk) 20:00, December 16, 2017 (UTC)
 * I think it's because of time passing, which caused the domain to change owners. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 15:50, December 17, 2017 (UTC)

Unblocking Edwin Shade
Hey Iko, welcome back to the wiki! I wanted to address your recent unblocking of Edwin Shade - about a month ago he was blocked for six months for behavior traces of which have been largely removed (but which as an admin you can go and look back at, I believe), which includes offending multiple users and attacking personally them (like shaming them for autism), and after the block he has swarmed the wiki with hundreds of sockpuppets to vandalize the wiki and keep attacking others. Just a couple of days ago we have discussed the situation and we have agreed to remove all of Edwin's contributions, and unblocking him essentially voids all of it. True, he has recently stopped abusing other accounts and has promised to behave, but it's only been four days - we have already had him make such promises which he was unable to keep even for a week's time. In my opinion Edwin does not deserve forgiveness, at least not yet. LittlePeng9 (talk) 16:21, March 13, 2018 (UTC)

Hello, LittlePeng9, I revoked the unblocking, especially he requested the block himself. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 16:40, March 13, 2018 (UTC)

Urgent Request!
May I have Content Moderator rights? There are a ton of videos that were uploaded and yet are no longer on YouTube, so all they are is taking up needless space now. I'd also like to delete the inappropriate pictures and videos that were uploaded recently.

I promise I'll take care of things and be a very industrious helper to keep this wiki a safe place. Xyzklip (talk) 15:56, March 20, 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't give these rights to you - ask Vel! or some VSTF member for that. Aren't you Edwin Shade himself, by the way? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 16:09, March 20, 2018 (UTC)


 * What? Oh hell no! I'm just someone who wants to clean up this place for good. But okay, I'll take your suggestion and ask Vel! - thanks for the quick response! Xyzklip (talk) 16:12, March 20, 2018 (UTC)

Protection request
Can you protect Illegal number and Illegal prime from recreation? --84.61.221.211 07:42, March 28, 2018 (UTC)

Why are you asking about it, if you created these pages yourself? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 08:10, March 28, 2018 (UTC)


 * Because some other user could recreate them. --84.61.221.211 08:11, March 28, 2018 (UTC)


 * And both Illegal numbers and Illegal primes also need to protected from recreation. --84.61.221.211 09:18, March 28, 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 09:32, March 28, 2018 (UTC)

Request
Please restore the blog post you recently deleted, as I've made perfectly clear on my user page, it was only intended to be a joke and an expression of my artistic creativity. Thanks! :) Thantasmagoria (talk) 13:58, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * This "expression of artistic creativity" seems to be a hair-raiser rather than joke. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 14:21, April 9, 2018 (UTC)

Indian names for the 10th to 13th powers for a crore
Why have you deleted four pages? I used Wikipedia as a source. --84.61.221.211 11:19, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not a source. Also, "ahaha" is a silly name for a number. Just imagine: "There are 100 billion ahahas" particles in the Observable Universe. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:49, April 15, 2018 (UTC)

Proposed Constitution
Please vote on this.

User_blog:Nnn6nnn/Proposed_Constitution!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  (talk) 00:24, May 16, 2018 (UTC)

Where are you
You haven’t contributed in a long time DrCocktor (talk) 15:16, March 28, 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, it's right by some reasons. :c Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 11:42, April 1, 2019 (UTC)

Hmm
Most edits, huh? Well, this guy might catch up soon... ;D Pesterchat (talk) 21:59, November 1, 2019 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think I poppy poppe would be more of a recent challenger than testitem, but neither is even close to having the most edits. Moooosey (talk) 23:42, November 1, 2019 (UTC)

About Luckyluxius
Hello Ikosarakt1. I noticed you blocked Luckyluxius' accounts for two different durations each, the longest of which was three days. I can understand why you did this, but feel it would be best to extend the block to when Luckyluxius turns 13, in two years. In this comment, he said he was 11, which is against ToU. Of course, there have been many users (Googleaarex, Vel!, and others) for instance that have joined the wiki before 13. However, because of Luckyluxius' current struggles, I think he needs a break from the site. Neither you nor I are qualified to help, but I think this will nudge him to get the help he needs.

If you feel differently we can discuss it here, but, in any case, I've known friends his age who have tried to self-harm, so, this is a matter that is serious to me. Kim TheDylanJ (talk) 00:39, December 12, 2019 (UTC)

Come on, It shouldn't be that long! Luckyluxiuz (talk) 17:34, December 30, 2019 (UTC)

Question on Mega
According to the history page on Mega, you added the description "More digits can be calculated quite easily using " but I could not understand what actual method you are refering to. How do you compute last digits of Mega using modular exponentiation?

I noticed that the description is the copy of Vel!'s one appearing in the history page for tetration, which I deleted because it was wrong. If you just copied it by believing that it works, then the description on Mega is perhaps wrong, too. If so, can I delete your description? In order to compute such a recursion, it is insufficient to simply iterate modular exponentiations sharing the base. As I corrected the article on tetration, we need to non-trivially iterate modular exponentiations with distinct bases using Euler function φ.

p-adic 14:33, December 19, 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I forgot things that I did a lot of years ago. Yes, of course you may remove my description if it was wrong. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 14:56, December 19, 2019 (UTC)


 * I see. Thank you.
 * p-adic 15:05, December 19, 2019 (UTC)