User blog comment:Primussupremus/more depth in the expansions and theory of my array notation part 2./@comment-30754445-20170518192340

The rule in text seemed clear enough, but the example at the end undid all of that clarity.

First of all, it seems to imply that 3^^3 is equal {3,4,3|0}, when the previous text says it is {3,4,3|1}. Which is it?

Secondly, the progression is strange. Why would there be 3^(3^27) arrows at the point you wrote "2 recursions"? 3^(3^27) is 3^^4 which - given the previous textual explanation - shouldn't appear in the calculation at all.

So either the textual explanation is wrong, or the example at the end is wrong. I have a good hunch which one of them is correct, but I won't tell you because I want this notation to be 100% yours. I want you to be able to pride yourself as the sole creator of the final product, once you fix the problems.

(I'm also asking the other people here to refrain from educated guesses on the matter, for the same reason)