User talk:Googleaarex/Old2

Current ~ Old 1 ~ Old 2

CAUTION! DO NOT MESSAGE!

A new talk page
I stored a old page to a new one, thanks. Aarex (talk) 00:38, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Infinities
Hi, I have found several errors in your MEGA NUMBERS LIST involving infinities.


 * \(\omega + 1\): you wrote that "omega and one = lim(1,2,3,4,...,w)". This is not true, \(\omega + 1\) is a successor ordinal and thus isn't the limit of anything. It's the set \(\{1, 2, 3, 4, \ldots, \omega\}\). Similar remarks for \(\omega + 2\), \(\omega 2 + 2\), etc.
 * \(\varepsilon_1\): Epsilon-one is the second fixed point of \(\alpha \mapsto \omega^\alpha\), so a better visualization is \(\omega \uparrow\uparrow (\omega + 1)\) because it yields \(\omega \uparrow \varepsilon_1 = \omega \uparrow (\omega \uparrow\uparrow (\omega + 1)) = \omega \uparrow\uparrow (1 + \omega + 1) = \omega \uparrow\uparrow (\omega + 1) = \varepsilon_1\).
 * \(\varepsilon_\text{absolute infinity}\), \(\aleph_\text{absolute infinity}\): Is this a joke? The point of absolute infinity is that you can't get any bigger!

FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 23:28, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

About absolute infinity: Actually, Sbiis Saibian also thinks that there's no such thing as a largest infinity, and created a "secret page" in his web site to make that point. Here's a relevant discussion.

Also, absolute infinity would be a fixed point of epsilons, alephs etc. so \(\varepsilon_\text{absolute infinity}\) or \(\aleph_\text{absolute infinity}\) wouldn't be any bigger than absolute infinity itself. If I were you, I'd rather use \(\varepsilon_{\text{absolute infinity}+1}\), \(\aleph_{\text{absolute infinity}+1}\). --I want more clouds! 02:28, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * But, since absolute infinity is "the biggest" ordinal, infinity + 1 is no greater than infinity!
 * You could say that absolute infinity (I'll call it \(\Omega\), not to be confused with \(\omega_1\)) is the first fixed point of the map \(\alpha \mapsto \alpha + 1\). That way you have \(\Omega = \Omega + 1\), and therefore \(\Omega \in \Omega\), and absolute infinity is the first self-containing ordinal. And here we have Russell's paradox: \(\Omega\) is the set of all ordinals that do not contain themselves. So even trying to define \(\Omega\) is problematic, let alone trying to manipulate it.
 * I suggest anyone who uses absolute infinity to exercise utmost caution. You know all that crap about "infinityplex" and "meginity"? We have the same problem here. By definition you can't get any bigger than infinity. FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 04:46, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. AarexTiao 17:03, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Minor edits
Aarex, please don't mark every single edits as minor. Don't you know how to use the 'minor edit' checkbox? --I want more clouds! 01:29, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Minor edit article: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Minor_edit#When_should_I_mark_an_edit_as_minor.3F This can help. $Jiawhein$\(a\)\(l\)\(t\) 01:45, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

A softer minor edit notice
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- I want more clouds! 08:29, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure he doesn't mark every his edit as minor by hand. He is just forget to remove a daw in his http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing opposite to "Mark all edits as "minor" by default". Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 09:13, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Template:wedges
Vote now! $Jiawhein$\(a\)\(l\)\(t\) 12:07, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Chapter 2
Chapter 2 of your book is a copy of one of Saibian's pages. Overall I will admit that I am unimpressed with the lack of original content in your website. FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 00:22, May 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * I think that the best thing is we shall not offend him. $Jiawhein$\(a\)\(l\)\(t\) 03:54, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I had to be frank and there's really no other way I can say it :/ FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 05:21, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Expecting him to delete that page? We shall discuss with Saibian. $Jiawhein$\(a\)\(l\)\(t\) 08:37, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Softly speaking, I noticed that Aarex is very fond to emulate (and often copy in full) other peoples' work. For example, once he copied my page about Goucher's strings. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 08:55, May 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * what?! he did this too? And you mean what by saying "Softly speaking"? $Jiawhein$\(a\)\(l\)\(t\) 09:10, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, he did. Softly is because I don't want to being rude here. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 09:19, May 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. $Jiawhein$\(a\)\(l\)\(t\) 09:33, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Humongulusplex
Humongulusplex has {10,10,humongulus} entries, not just a boogolplex. Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 10:20, June 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Fixed. AarexTiao 16:34, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Aarex Function
On this page, I found a problem on your function.


 * Rule 6 is: Arx(n ; 1 ; ... ; 1 ;m) = Arx(n,..,n ; n,...,n ; ... ; n,...,n ; n,...,n ; m-1) (n n's)
 * and Rule 9 is: Arx(n ; 1 ; ... ; 1 ;m) = Arx(n,..,n ; n,...,n ; ... ; n,...,n ; n,...,n ; m-1)

So Rule 9 is actually a duplicate of Rule 6. Please fix it.

Thanks, ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 01:00, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Your number
You check your illion numbers and see if there is spelling error and the formation error. like 103·2997. IAmJiawhein (talk) 11:34, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

Ennicennigiennillion
Is this number really 103*2997 = 2997000 or 103*2997? Ikosarakt1 (talk ^ contribs) 12:42, June 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * 103*2997.AarexTiao 13:50, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

Teris-Terribocal Group
I found some duplicates on your site. On this page, it says:


 * Teris-Terrible-Terribocal = Forcal1,2,1,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Terribocal = Forcal1,3,1,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Terribocal = Forcal1,4,1,2(1)


 * Teris-Terrible-Tris-Terribocal = Forcal1,1,2,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Tris-Terribocal = Forcal1,1,3,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Tris-Terribocal = Forcal1,1,4,2(1)

It should be:


 * Teris-Terrible-Terribocal = Forcal1,2,1,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Tribocal = Forcal1,3,1,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Tetribocal = Forcal1,4,1,2(1)


 * Teris-Terrible-Tris-Terribocal = Forcal1,1,2,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Tris-Tribocal = Forcal1,1,3,2(1)
 * Teris-Terrible-Tris-Tetribocal = Forcal1,1,4,2(1)

Thanks. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 06:23, July 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Fixed. AarexTiao 14:28, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Errata
I hope you don't mind me dumping another error list for your site.


 * Mega Numbers List:
 * "[The square root of 2] is first irrational number after 1." I don't think you know what an irrational number is; there is no "first" irrational number after 1. For example, \(\sqrt{5} - 1\) is irrational and it is between 1 and \(\sqrt{2}\).
 * "Golden Radio = 1+sqrt(Golden Radio)." Nope! \(1 + \sqrt{\phi} \approx 2.2720196495\) while \(\phi \approx 1.6180339887\). The equation you are looking for is \(\phi = 1 + 1/\phi\).
 * "[The square root of 5] is first irrational number after 2." See above.
 * "There is no 7-face polyhedron." There are many such polyhedra; see . Examples include the and . You might mean to say that there is no regular polyhedron with seven faces.
 * Rayo's number is much greater than either of the listed Aarex numbers.
 * Chapter 0:
 * "-0 is equal to 0?????? It positive!" Zero isn't positive. It's neither negative nor positive.
 * Chapter 1:
 * "Zeroth operator is NOT exist!" A hyper-0 operator is defined on Munafo's site.

FB100Z &bull; talk &bull; contribs 23:14, July 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Fixed. AarexTiao 23:53, July 14, 2013 (UTC)