User blog comment:PsiCubed2/Does anybody here know where I can have serious googology questions answered?/@comment-35470197-20181114222222/@comment-30754445-20181115090911

BTW, we've already seen claims of "proofs" in japanese that BM1 terminates... and in the end it turned out that it is hopelessly broken even before we get to (0,0)(1,1)(2,2).

Which brings me to a question that bothered me for quite some time now:

Why don't you guys translate your work into english, so others can verify your work? Mistakes happen, which is why it is standard academic procedure to allow the general mathematical community to inspect new proofs before they are accepted as valid.

The incident I've mentioned in my the first paragraph of this comment is an excellent example for why this is so. For quite a long time, everybody here (including myself) just accepted the fact that BM1 terminates without question on grounds that "there is a proof". And we accepted it because we had no way to inspect the actual work (which was written in a language we do not understand).