User blog comment:XXxKennyDashxXx/A NEW NOTATION! HBAN./@comment-10429372-20150103173036

Further, AHBAN is not well-defined, because you define {a,b( Ξ ●)2} to b both {a,b( Ξ ) {a,b( Ξ )...} } and {a,b( Ξ _ {a,b( Ξ _ <span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'OpenSans','HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;line-height:20px;"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'OpenSans','HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;line-height:20px;"><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'OpenSans','HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;line-height:20px;">... )2} <span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'OpenSans','HelveticaNeue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;line-height:20px;">)2} or I misunderstood GHBAN because of your unclear definition. In that case it would probably not reach further than φ(ω,0,0)*(ω^2)