User blog comment:Nnn6nnn/Proposed Constitution!!!!!!!!!!!!!/@comment-31966679-20180513205333/@comment-31966679-20180513210458

For Article IV, Section II, it says that a direct or indirect attack is not allowed. There is a flaw with this. You are not specifying from whose point of view an attack is. For example, if someone makes a blog post about a number or function they made, and someone comes and comments a way to make a function grow faster, the creator of the blog post could say that the comment could have been an indirect attack from insulting the creator's knowledge from the most sensitive person in the world's point of view. Fix this by changing it so that an admin/bureaucrat has to make sure that it is indeed an attack before kicking out the attacker.