User blog comment:Emlightened/We have more numbers than pages./@comment-28606698-20170808192559/@comment-27513631-20170810145531

Psi is correct, that page is awesome.

And the using a standard notation for comparisons may be a good idea, but there are a couple of small issues with actually doing that IMO.

The only 'unbiased' notation is the FGH, and its less-useful relatives HH and SGH. However, we would require a canonical ordinal notation and fundamental sequence system for the site.

Additionally, it may be convenient for some readers to have the full comparison available. Perhaps this could be done by making pages that approximate the FGH in other notations, so a \(\varepsilon_0\) to \(\zeta_0\) page, for instance, would have a column of ordinals and many columns of notations, and each row contains an ordinal, and numbers/functions that correspond to that growth rate. This would basically be the same as taking some regiment page, rearranging the columns, and removing many of the entries to make it more viewable.