User blog comment:Primussupremus/hyper notation./@comment-28606698-20170408220105/@comment-28606698-20170409175506

I am not sure it can be considered well defined number, As for me it was rather hard to understand to understand exactl value of your number. You use notation of hyper operations and then across all the page, you describe how much times this notation applied to itself. it seems your last number slightly large {10,10,2,2} using BEAF or $$f_{\omega+2}(10)$$ using FGH, may be $$f_{\omega+2}(f_{\omega+1}(10))$$, but, please, notice how laconical and clearly it expressed in BEAF or FGH.