User blog comment:Ubersketch/Why haven't people been formalizing and fixing things?/@comment-35470197-20181209220623

It is very hard to formalise intuition-based OCFs. Actually, there are several googologists who tried the formalisation of UNOCF, but they have not succeeded yet. Therefore it is not fair to blame them for laziness.

Concerning myself, I prefer formalising my stuffs to formalising stuffs created by others, i.e. UNOCF. Maybe others do, too, because I heard someone to say that the creator of UNOCF is the one who should formalise it. So it is not derived from our laziness. (As an exception, I formalised PSS, which is a portion of BMS, and verified the termination.)

Anyway, why don't you formalise all of them by yourself? According to your statement, you would be working with them, because you do no look lazy.