User blog comment:Cyias123/A new idea/@comment-32747646-20170729210410

Let me clarify things, I should have been more specific. I will add this to the body of the original posting.

Let's compare my idea to Graham's Number. We begin by saying n=3, to give us an idea of starting and ending points. Graham's Number proceeds like this 3↑↑↑3, then add an arrow ↑ so it looks like 3↑↑↑↑3, Graham called that G1. Add arrow ↑, and another, and another, until you reach G2. In total Graham's Number has about 256 arrows (64*4=256), However, I stop at 3↑↑↑3, because this is the n number for the first level, and I calculate to whatever number that expression creates. For this example, we can say 3↑↑↑3 creates a Googolplex and we can call that L1. We move on to the next level, using the number created in the first level to provide us the number of arrows we will need in level 2, in this case it will be 3↑ with Googolplex arrows ↑3. We will give level 3 the same treatment, and then calculate the factorial. As we can see, Graham's Number is much larger than Level 1; however, Level 2 is far, far bigger than Graham's Number, and Level 3 is even greater than that.