User blog comment:B1mb0w/Fundamental Sequences/@comment-26428969-20151104162536/@comment-10262436-20151107051103

I have added a calculated example for zeta_0[2] and used either c=0 and c=1. The results of allowing c to vary are very confusing. Surely there can be a rule-set for Veblen Fundamental Sequence that we all can agree on.

c=0 produces an ordinal that feels too small (surely e_{e_1} is better result)

c=1 is unsatisfying because it looks arbitrary (surely c=n is more natural...!)