User blog comment:PsiCubed2/My own version of BMS/@comment-35470197-20181120231600/@comment-30754445-20181122154842

Why would anybody expect to get any kind of recognition for work that was never published or verified in any way?

What makes your accusation even more absurd, is the fact that I've never even claimed to  have a solution at hand. All I said was that I have an idea regarding how to prove termination of the PSS version I've given here. And I've even emphasized that I'm not at all certain that my approach has merit.

Surely, if this were a case of me lying in order to gain recognition as genius problem-solver, I would have made my lies more impressive?

(as for the "mystery" of my "rudeness" to you, the explanation is simple: you've misinterpreted my posts and got offended by things I've never actually thought or said)