User blog comment:B1mb0w/J Function Sandpit J 4/@comment-27173506-20160205161632/@comment-10262436-20160206050042

Hi. Not sure what you are referring to when you say their are mistakes in this blog. This blog is focussed on FGH functions with n = 2 and diagonalises every ordinal with [n] = [2].

The results on the blog should be fine and are consistent with my separate blog on Fundamental Sequences.

BTW. In your other comment on this blog, you calculate f_zeta_0(2)=f_e_0(2)=f_w^w(2), but I find the result (on this blog) of f_zeta_0(2)=f_e_{e_0}(2) to be more satisfying. It is derived from the rules on my Fundamental Sequences blog.