User blog:Primussupremus/Expanding my notation.

Last time we looked at the part of my notation that goes like this (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{k}[n]) the k is the numerical index of the notation and the n is what you are applying it to (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{k}[n]) has an approximate growth rate of fw+k+4(n)-fw2(n). For example (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{1}[5]) is approximately equal to fw2(5)=fw+5(5) and (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{96}[100]) is approximately equal to fw2(100)=fw+100(100). The next stage after this would be to get the notation up to the fw3 to fw^2 level of the fast growing hierarchy. (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{k}[n]|p|) the (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{k}[n]) is very familiar to us but the p isn't. I'll give an example then explain what is happening (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{1}[5]|5|) is approximately equal to fw2+5(5)=fw3(5). (a,b,c#[x]|{y}|{2}[6]|6|) is approximately equal to fw+6+6(6)=fw+12(6) as you can see this part of the notation has an approximately growth rate of fw2+k to fw3. That's all I've got just now later on I'll have more.