User blog comment:Dchew89/General Idea for my d(n) Function/@comment-35470197-20190306060453/@comment-38080588-20190306063717

When I learn what all of that means, I'll be sure to do it. I'm not sure if I should focus on that first, or focus more on trying to create a more powerful method for defining ordinals that isn't so easily dominated by my function in the not-so-ill-defined way it works in my own mind. In my studying, I like to say that only the FS's given can be used to make larger ordinals, so the \(d(4)=\omega^2\) wouldn't work unless that specific sequence were recognized beforehand. But I will definitely try to formalize this more, I'm just not that great at learning things like formalizing when I could be doing things like strengthening instead. Every time I say I'll learn to formalize, I put it off another blog post. But I'll get there.