User blog comment:Ubersketch/Submit a paper/@comment-35470197-20190515010608/@comment-35470197-20190522234022

> I suspect the reason why the proof that took more than half a month to complete had lots of mistakes because there was no peer reviewing.

Exactly. That is why I personally did peer-reviewing. The result was that the author could not understand why problems were problems even though I pointed out many mistakes, because the author did not know definitions of notions appearing the manuscript.

> Also why exactly do you not want to submit your paper?

Mathematicians are evaluated by the quality and the impact of their publications. If I submit the work on pair sequence system, the resulting impact is much less than my average papers devoted to my best branches of mathematics. Therefore I have demerits more than merits in publishing. It is better for me to just have the manuscript open for others. (Also, I think that it would not be regarded to be worth publishing in a valid journal, because googology is not a majour branch of mathematics now. Therefore it could be published in a no peer-reviewing very low-leveled academically invalid journal.)

> where did you learn to do proofs

I learned proofs in a standard way. I leared mathematics in schools, studied mathematics with many standard textbooks and standard papers, held many seminars with supervisors and many fellows, participated in many conferences, and so on.