User blog comment:PsiCubed2/Proposal: Disallowing Nonsensical Blog Posts/@comment-32213734-20180421023442

Well, I'm going to post long blog about problems of internet where I'm going to tell what I think about such problems.

I think that users do not post something new because they already posted what they wanted to post, or it is already presents on Googology Wiki, or they start to understand that they are not so good in math as it was seemed. But it is good - it means that, in fact, they begin to understand math better. At least this is so in my case - I made up something that worked well up to BHO, but then I found that some things do not work beyond BHO. So, I have to change something. But what exactly? I tried different options, and there are a lot of them. I try to check all options and find the most perspective way. But I'm too lazy to describe each option, most of which are fail. That's the reason why I do not create many posts.

As for low quality blog posts, they do not cause me any problems, but some of them seemed to me too short and dull. When I read them, I just felt a slight disappointment, since I was expecting something more interesting.

I think that we should disallow only absolutely nonsensical and highly likely intentionally bad and erroneous blog posts.

And, as Rpakr pointed out, the problem is to define "low quality" (it would be nice to give examples).