User blog comment:P進大好きbot/Analysis of 非想非非想 notation/@comment-39541634-20190827132021/@comment-35470197-20190827223658

@Syst3ms

I know it. I did not expect that a definition written in Japanese is helpful for non-Japanese googologists. But for me, writing a definition in Japanese is musch more meaningful than writing intuition-based explanations without a definition, like the original UNOCF, the original Pi notation, the original BEAF beyond tetration, and so on, because at least Japanese can read it.

@Plain'N'Simple

> Shall I remind you of the faulty termination "proof " of BM1?

I do not forget it. There were perhaps few Japanese googologists who can check arguments. At least, we have more Japanese googologists npw.

(1) Right. I should clarify that since I am mainly in Japanese googology community, I know more Japanese active specialists than non-Japanese active specialists, and the circumstance arround me is not the usual one.

(2) I disagree with it. How many googologists who read this wiki are active? I am certain that there are more active googologists in Japanese googological events. The event to which I submitted this is a big one, to which people submitted 87 large numbers. There are 5 official referees, who reject, analyse, and help to improve definitions. Inofficially, participants freely check others'. Although all definitions had not been completely analysed during the event because of the limitation of the period, 40 days this time, at least I actually got more feedbacks during the event than daily feedbacks here.

> By the way, is Hyp cos (who you recently called "one of our best anaylists") Japanese?

I do not know. But I think that he is not feeding back to others so frequently, unless someone is directly asking him questions.