User blog comment:Rpakr/Reforms 2/@comment-5150073-20190909115744/@comment-39541634-20190909213012

So you say that the more, the merrier?

If so, where will you draw the line? Why should these specific numbers have articles, while other numbers don't? There are an infinity of numbers out there, after all. Sure, the vast majority of them (100% to be exact) are convoluted salads, but many of the currently listed Saibianisms aren't much better. Should we also create an article for 187,955,078,942,638,257? Or for 73↑↑↑↑↑472↑↑58+1027+42? And if you say no, why not?

As for your last sentence, this is precisely the problem: For most of these numbers, there are no interesting properties, because they are just random numbers that happen to appear on some list on the web. I suppose we could write approximations for them or think of ways to grasp their size, but you can to that with any number, so my question of "why these numbers and not others" remain. Afer all, I could write an approximation for 73↑↑↑↑↑472↑↑58+1027+42 as well, but this - in itself - doesn't justify creating an article for that number...