User blog comment:--MULLIGANACEOUS--/The YETI function, regarding Oblivion./@comment-30118230-20161223082533/@comment-26388711-20161223100708

Sure. YETI is directly based on Bowers' defition of K(n), but since his K system usn't well defined, then YETI also isn't well defined. However, Bowers did claim tgat his K system is well defined.

Which evidences refute the well-definedness of Bowers' K system?