User blog comment:P進大好きbot/New Googological Ruler/@comment-31580368-20190718022500/@comment-35470197-20190718235848

By the way, would you update you analysis table with 2000 steps? I sometimes see googologists quote it in a wrong manner, because it does not clarify what OCFs you are using. Beginners are misunderstanding that an OCF which the know were the same one as one of the OCF in 2000 steps. For example, as far as I know, several googologists misunderstood that you were refering to Rathjen's standard OCF, because you used a similar notation. In order to avoid such misleadings, it is better to declare the sources of the definitions of the OCFs.