User blog comment:MachineGunSuper/Fractal Factorial/@comment-32876686-20180208200102

As pertains to googological functions, there are different mental "textures" I associate with them; for instance, when dealing with ordinal collapsing functions it feels much like an accordion going back and forth as I expand and take the limit of various terms only to culminate in popping in a needed cardinal when I encounter a fixed point. When dealing with Taranovsky's notation, I get a feeling of compactness and terse strength, like touching the skin of a massive animal while they are at rest. Veblen notations give me the same feeling as when I organize my room and often nest receptacles inside receptacles to hold my stuff, and the basic hyper operators do not feel compact to me, but rather feel like curved surfaces - elegantly designed, but which are very simple.

When dealing with your functions however I associate a torn and stringy rag to them, as they could most definitely be more compact and powerful. In your defense however, I felt this function was original, even if it wasn't powerful. Here is a playlist worth watching if you'd like to know how to surpass hexational growth rates, (which you seem to be having trouble surpassing).