User blog comment:Rpakr/Reforms 2/@comment-5150073-20190909115744/@comment-35470197-20190910134601

I could not understand why the moderator deleted articles which are not violating any rules. It is not a reformation at all, but is just a rule breaking. Even if people regard the current rule as an inappropriate one, the solution is not to ignore it, but is to officially change the rule.

According to rpakr, those articles are worth deleting because many of them are unimportant. Then if people stated that many of my blog posts which I created were unimportant, should I allow those to censor them freely? I know that I am talking about the extreme imagination, but censoring regal articles and spoiling freedom of expression not violating the current rule should be strictly avoided. Or is there any reason why we refuse to argue on how to change/keep the current rules before starting the deletion?