User blog comment:LittlePeng9/Random Turing machines/@comment-5529393-20130418180243/@comment-1605058-20130418185123

It surely isn't Busy Beaver! I'm sure same machine could work with 2-3 states less, and, as uncomputable functions grow even more rapidly over time, difference must be enormous. Still, this machine is too... obvious to be Busy Beaver. I think even BB(160,2) has big chance of outgrowing Loader's number, maybe even BB(100,2)