Talk:Giabixul

It's hard to make approximations to Hyper-E notation and Chain arrow notation for giabixul numbers. Although we can say giabixul ~ 200->200->...200->199->200 with 201 200's before the 199 ~ \(200\rightarrow_2202\), kilogiabixul ~ 200->200->...200->(200->200->...200->199->200)->200 with 201 200's before the 199 and 201 200's before the (...) ~ \(200\rightarrow_2202\) still! And, giabixul ~ E200##200##...200##200#200#...200#200 with 200 ##'s and 199 #'s ~ E200###202, but kilogiabixul ~ E200##200##...200##200#200#...200#200#2 with 200 ##'s and 199 #'s ~ E200###202 still! So, if we make these approximations more acculate we need more complex notation, if we make these approximations more simple we get them too rough. hyp$hyp?cos&#38;cos (talk) 02:20, December 1, 2013 (UTC)