User blog comment:Tetramur/Possible explanations to tetrational arrays on BEAF/@comment-39541634-20190908000507/@comment-37993808-20190909122020

> skipping so many intermediate steps Ok, I expanded my blog post to explain some intermediate steps (all possible in part 1). > Since you've limited your discussion only to expressions of the form f(X) & 10 It is clear that if I change the number X (in prime position), then the number of substages, stages and groups will change. But I don't try to get it 'cause in my case only one number needs to be changed - if I don't follow this rule, I would not see the pattern that is emerged from my notes.