User blog comment:SuperSpruce/What do you think the growth rate of the Meameamealokkapowwa oompa is?/@comment-30754445-20190102180148

The mathematically correct answer is quite boring:

The meameamealokkapoowa oompa isn't well-defined, because all Bowerisms beyond tetrational arrays are not well-defined.

But that's no fun, isn't it? You're probably interested in how big the number would be if BEAF actually worked the way we expected it to work.

In that case, meameamealokkapoowa oompa would be far bigger than TFB. {n,n / 2} is already supposed to have a growth rate similar to ψ(Ωω).