User blog comment:Tachyonic Encrypter/Getting bigger than Rayo's function. Is it possible?/@comment-4224897-20141120012826/@comment-25593348-20141120203604

This is  not sin #4. Here is why.

According to the article, it states the following:

...Now mind you going meta doesn't always have to be paradoxical, and it isn't excluded solely because of that. It's excluded because it's not conducive to the googological enterprise. It is actually possible to turn this paradoxical meta into a totally valid one. How? Simply do this:

"[Username]'s Number is the sum of all valid numbers on this wiki as of [Insert Specific Date] plus 1...

Now the counterargument,

My number is the sum of the answer of all equations ever conceived by a living being as of [currently undefinable date] plus 1.

Now, the [currently undefinable date] is technically definable, but the real secret to this equation is not the "going meta" aspect, but really the other half of the equation. Every time someone conceives 1+1=2, the number is 2 plus its previous answer. This logic of this, truthfully speaking, is more along the lines of leaning toward the googological sin #7. This is, of course, technically findable, simply because of tachyonic particles. Tachyonic particles are particles that move faster than light. Now, combined with another piece of information, being that if you were to travel at the speed of light, you would never age, you obtain time travel. Infact, that was the exact reason I picked my pseudonym. I knew that the biggest possible number was achievable because of mathematical extremities. Unfortunately for you guys, the more you think about this number, the harder it is to surpass.

The end result of this number is definable, because of the temporal notation at the end of the post. I can fully explain it better in person, but I cannot do that. Essentially different arrows determine different time lapses. I added this at the end to see how people could brainstorm this.

The other argument is that you could say that there will always be a larger function after time, so that Rayo's number is under the same bases (basis pl.) as mine, except my number cannot be put into the category of function, but instead a program. If using these formats, I have proven that the number is legitimate.

Tachyonic Encrypter