User blog comment:P進大好きbot/Images without Copyright/@comment-3427444-20200131171829/@comment-35470197-20200201052955

> If I steal money from your wallet, you don't have that money any more. If I copy an image from somewhere, te original person still has it and can do with it what they want, just like you can.

It is a wrong point of view. The original person's right is actually violated. Do you agree with that there are human rights which are not bounded by actual physical objects? Are you seriously ignoring intellectual property rights, which are elementary human rights widely accepted in the world?

> I would say more, but I'd be quoting from the wbesite Cloudy linked, which you probably would say is from an obviously anti-copyright perspective...

I know that there are people who disagree to accept several human rights. But it is irrelevant to the fact that copyright exists in terms of laws and rules. You can legally work toward the world in order to change laws in the future, but it does not mean that you are morally allowed to break any current laws or rules which you want to remove before they are actually changed. Do you really think that it is sufficient to quote those opinions?

Could you answer the following points?
 * 1) Do you understand intellectual property rights and Antragsdelikt?
 * 2) Do you understand that we need to respect copyright due to laws and rules?
 * 3) Are you willing to ignore such laws and rules?
 * 4) Do you understand that the existence of people who disagree with existing laws or rules does not imply that you can freely break them?