User blog comment:Cookiefonster/New rule proposal/@comment-27516045-20160804193521

This is kind of a good idea, but I see the following situation possible coming up:


 * Someone makes a page on their notation
 * An admin deletes it for being original work
 * Another user at some later point creates an article on the same notation

The admins couldn't justify deleting the page again.

I'm mostly looking at this because I just made my own site, and figured I'd see exactly how the rule is worded. Which of the following are allowed:


 * An article on your own notation
 * An article on a number in your own notation
 * An article on a number you made with someone else's notation

And I just realized that Aarex made the Aarex's Array Notation page, so technically it should be gone, but I've already contributed to it and then someone else would restore it.

I'm not saying this is a bad idea totally - a complete newbie creatign pages for salad numbers is not what we want here. But if it's notable or interesting, allow it.