User blog comment:P進大好きbot/Images without Copyright/@comment-3427444-20200131171829/@comment-35470197-20200201125232

@Username

Then even if we have different opinion the definition of the term "stealing", it is irrelevant to the fact that we should obey laws and rules, isn't it? You are not the one who actually violates creators' right under the assumption that it does not influence their money, are you? Even if you were that person, it is irrelevant to the fact that admins are just ones who execute the community's decision instead of breaking laws and rules due to their own philosophy.

Say, do you agree with that we have personality rights? Generally, it is not so difficult to violate someone's personality rights compared to other occupation rights such as the right to occupate your own money, but it does not mean that it can be freely violated as long as it does not influence their money. The arguments on "the situation changed so that it is much easier to commit something than before" is often quoted in a wrong way. It does not mean that laws and rules on them are freely ignorable. It means that we are standing at a point to argue on how to protect our rights and to punish violators through setting reasonable laws or rules. Even if it will be much easier for thieves to steal moneys than now in the future, it does not mean that stealing can be considered as an appropriate action.

According to you, you understand the current laws. Then do you have a reason why you do not want to obey them? Something like "because nobody cared about it" is non-sense. It just meant that the members did not notice the issue or did not seriously consider the violation. It does not mean that laws and rules are allowing us to do so. Why now? Whenever we find something inapproperiate, we should solve it.