User blog comment:Edwin Shade/An Analysis Of The Bashicu Pair Sequence System/@comment-1605058-20180104184548/@comment-30754445-20180104190732

@LittlePeng9:

Well, it does force the reader to actually read every single symbol carefully. So yes, it does result in a different kind of thought process which is quite refreshing once you get used to it.

Whether it actually ensures that there are no leaps of logic - I doubt it. But it may make the thought process clearer for some people.

@Edwin Shade:

I actually find this experiment to be very illuminating.

But if you choose to change the format (which might be inevitable once things become really complex), I strongly recommend that you still try to explain as much of your reasoning as you can with words. I really liked, for example, how you described the transition from "1,2,3..." to omega.

So remember: It's not an all-or-nothing proposition. And the "analysis with words" in the title can be interperted as "analysis that uses as little symbolic math as possible".

Either way, I'm quite interested to see how this is going to pan out. Great project.