User blog comment:Kyodaisuu/Pseudo Rayo's number/@comment-180.214.233.28-20141218163823/@comment-1605058-20141219131145

1. I completely don't get your point. If I said "largest Heegner number" instead of "largest positive integer" your argument would still work (because we don't constrain us to numbers less than, say, 10000), but still, largest Heegner number is a well-defined number, equal to 163. "Largest positive integer" can be rewritten as "positive integer such that no other positive integer is larger". I have no idea what kind of ambiguity is there.

2. What do Stern primes and coprime amicable pairs have to do with our conversation?