User blog comment:Mh314159/Natural number recursion -- first 6 rule sets/@comment-35470197-20191031004425/@comment-35470197-20191031232111

Although I am not a native speaker, I guess that "mish-mash" just means "combination of two or more functions". I note that the majority of notations consists of a single (possible variadic) function. For example, arror notation, primitive sequence system, BEAF (up to the well-defined realm, of course), and so on. When we mix up several notations, then we can extend it arbitrary many times by adding new symbols and new rules. Therefore it is good for creators. On the other hand, it makes the notation really difficult to analyse, and hence it potentially reduces effective feedbacks. That is why we avoid adding new symbols, and we rather prefer to create a new notation based on a new strategy.

Of course, you can choose to keep that strategy. We just recommend a lighter notation in order for you to obtain many effective feedbacks. For example, I am personally not confident that I can give sufficient feedbacks in the current stage. If it is written in a single notation roughly compatible with FGH, then it will be much easier to analyse. Please remember my analysis in the comment to your previous blog post. Then you will find that it looks really hard to check my analysis or even to point out ambiguous estimations. Namely, the result of the analysis also becomes too complicated, and hence does not give so effective feedbacks other than the limit.