User blog comment:P進大好きbot/New Googological Ruler/@comment-31580368-20190629142620/@comment-35470197-20190629143545

1) See the difference of the definitions here.

2) I only intend to scale well-defined googology. Therefore it is natural to be inconvenient to scale large numbers which are not known to be well-defined, e.g. large numbers createfd by BMS and DAN.

> I propose another computable scale based solely on PTO of some theory.

It is completely ill-defined, because you do not have a well-defined recursive system of fundamental systems. I used the greatest ordinal notations in order to avoid such ill-definedness.