User blog comment:Syst3ms/YAUD/@comment-30754445-20180810132619/@comment-35392788-20180811210058

@PsiCubed2

"Syst3ms is being deliberately confusing"

Keep your shirt on, for crying out loud. You can call me inexperienced, noobish, too informal, or whatever you seem to equate to "despicable", but deliberately confusing everyone? Come on, I know you're not stupid enough to actually think that.

To address the main point, fixing the "problems" you're talking about is far, FAR easier than actually defining it as an OCF. Why I'm not explicitly calling the objects of this system "ordinals" is because actual ordinals give me constraints under which the only way to formally define UNOCF is to use an actual OCF, which this attempt is precisely NOT trying to do. It would restrict a lot of my freedom of definition.