User blog comment:Vel!/FGH Gripe/@comment-5982810-20150325004329/@comment-146.111.120.99-20150326000749

(3) Dude are you kidding me I offered an alternative right in the blog post. It's right there. That's half of why I made the post.

Correct me if I'm wrong, do you mean to say your "dominates over" is a replacement for "comparable to"? If so that's not what I mean by offering an alternative. What I mean is, if your going to chuck all the existing "guesses" and "is comparable to" with nothing, or with conjectures based on sounder definitions,  then you aren't offering an alternative. An alternative will be a NEW way to go about establishing these things. Essentially if your just going to replace the language the same underpinning ideas are supporting it: enumeration techniques, and as you pointed out, without *proof* we can't know that functions stablize against each other. So this actually doesn't make any significant change for our community. An alternative would be a BETTER WAY to come up with comparisons other than enumeration techniques, and a sound definition, in and of itself, is not a new technique. What I just showed you at (1) is an example of new technique