User blog comment:Bubby3/A survey of 200 random pages./@comment-30754445-20180430083714

The sheer number of articles isn't the problem.

The problem is that the vast majority of these numbers only have an article because they appear on some list. Most of them are numbers that even their creator didn't have anything to say about them.

Here, I just pressed the "random" page myself and got this:

http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/Exaddep

How is this in any way notable? Denis Maksudov's naming system is definitely notable (and funnily enough, there isn't an article either on him or his notation), but why does this specific number have an article? Because it specifically mentioned on on his website, that's why. But even Denis himself didn't have anything to say about this specific number. It is just given as en example of how to use his naming system.

Pressing the random button a few more times, I get more articles for which a similar objection can be made. ALL of them were articles whose sole reason for existing is the appearance of a name in a (usually very large) list.

And that's the problem.