User blog comment:Boboris02/Large number combinatorics II:Trying to prove something interesting/@comment-2033667-20170206081115/@comment-1605058-20170206204540

Consider for example the line "Now we have proven that all" and the statement after it, which says that an implication holds for all \(n,j,i\). A proof of such statement would entail taking arbitrary such \(n,j,i\) and showing how to derive the RHS of the implication from the LHS. Nothing like this is present in the post. All the previous sentences are unrelated to this one, or at least connected so loosely one cannot see how they logically imply it.