User blog comment:P進大好きbot/Elementary Large Number/@comment-30754445-20181118000005/@comment-35470197-20181118014723

> Explicit examples are indeed sufficient when you're doing a variation on an already familiar idea (for example, when you create an array notation that behaves like an FGH-clone).

I see.

> It looks vaguely similar to Emlightened's idea of "pink numbers" (which is also an epsilon-0 level function)

Oh, then I would like to see it. I searched it in this wiki, but could not find it. Could you give me a link?

> BTW you shouldn't try to mimic what "most people" here are doing. Many times, people don't bother with explanations and/or proofs simply because they don't understand the concepts themselves

I thought (and was sometimes implicitly told) that explanations with heavy mathematics have readers to keep away, but it is just a matter of degree. I will add more informative explanation later.

> Another thing that may help, is to write your examples in ascending order of the equivalent ordinals.

Ok. I am writing ordinals in the ascending order now. Thank you!