User blog comment:Meowzz/Psycubed/@comment-35039730-20180416193608/@comment-30754445-20180416212740

Sorry, but you completely lost any shred of believability when:

(1) You claimed to be a regular lurker on this site...

(2) ...yet you somehow didn't notice any of my past contributions...

(3) ...yet just a few minutes after allegedly encountering my blog posts for the first time, you were able to discuss their subject matter as if you've read them many times in the past.

And then there's the fact that you:

(1) Tried to change the subject of lots of discussions in a way that would get Edwin more attention.

(2) Called the interactions between me and him "a flame war". That one, really, nailed it for me. You've deliberately chosen to complete ignore the obvious fact that the guy was not just a troll, but a particularly persistent and malicious troll.

Now, I can't say with 100% confidence that you're a sock puppet. But I can say with 100% confidence that you've been deceitful (in more ways than one) and that your "contributions" from the past month were - for the lack of a better word - laughable.

Let us look at them, shall we:

"Cloud(99)!" - nonsense blog post.

"Reductio Absurdum" - nonsense blog post.

"Arborocity" - ill-defined salad

"Counting to Zero by zero" - nonsense blog post

"Surreal Numbers" - seems like nonsense. If we're really generous - a blog post that just lacks vital background information to understand WTF it is about.

"Diagonalization" - a one line definition of a salad function + copying a small table from an external blog without giving credit

"Smallest Number Study" - Better than all the above, but still... what's the point? Cookiefonster summed up the situation nicely when he said "Just do 1/n and you're done". And it does look like an attempt to waste people's time on a pointless discussion without putting in any effort into it yourself (though LittlePeng managed a great save when he mentioned fusable numbers).

"Non-Arbortrary_Treenomials" - nonsense blog post

"TREE(3) vs SCG(2) which is bigger" - a valid question (which no person in the world knows the answer to, by the way). I'll give you that one.

"Psycubed" - I won't count this one either way. One, because it deals with me personally so I can't be objective. And two, because counting this one against you would be circular logic. After all, had you been an actual quality contributor to this site, your beaf (BEAF?) with me would have been quite understandable.

"Reductio Absurdum" - nonsense blog post

"Name the Pattern" - cool puzzle, but has absolutely nothing to do with googology.

All this in your first 5 days here.

Do we really need to tally up the good and the bad to see the picture? I'm sorry, but sock puppet or no, that is a terrible terrible record.

So if you're not Edwin, then I strongly suggest that you put more effort into actually writing constructive blog posts, and less effort into starting arguments. The further you distance yourself from anything even remotely related to this guy, the better.

Speaking of which.

Leave Nathan (nnn6nnn) alone. Edwin has already done enough damage to him, and this is no laughing matter.If you're really the new guy that you claim to be, then you should have no problem keeping away from this person (which you've allegedly never spoken to before).