User blog comment:Sbiis Saibian/Googology101 - Part II/@comment-4224897-20141023151855/@comment-5982810-20141023155731

Sam's Number would fall under acedia, for lack of specificity, gigoombaverse also has acedia since it involves physical constants, and a croutonillion is a gula (going off the deep end). Salad numbers however aren't actually a fundamental violation of googology though. It's only a violation if it fails to 2 most fundamental principles (1) can we compare it to other numbers and (2) Is it built-to-fail so to speak. Salad numbers, if they are well defined, can be precisely determined, and they can be beaten (easily). So this doesn't "break" googology. It's just poor practice. That's to be addressed later.