User blog comment:GdawgGamerTV/A New Number I thought of/@comment-35470197-20190106232311/@comment-30754445-20190111144508

The number in this blog post is ill-defined anyway, because it contains instances of "FOOT" without an argument. This is meaningless, because "FOOT" is a function rather than a number.

And of-course, even if we:

(1) Ignore this problem.

(2) Ignore the problem raised by P-bot regarding the well-definedness of the FOOT function itself.

It would be completely pointless to try and augment the FOOT function with mere powers and Bower arrays.Had we removed all these salady constructs, the number's size would not change in any considerable way. We could then add a single additional "FOOT[...]" to enclose the remaining expression, and still get a bigger number.