User blog comment:Username5243/Hedrondude just updated his large number pages/@comment-1605058-20160202140040/@comment-2033667-20160202181810

I think fudgy claims like "broadly comparable to f_e0" are okay as long as the definition of the function is agreed upon and the claim is properly labeled as informal. f_w_1^CK, however, is unacceptable. f_w_1 is mathematically impossible.