User blog comment:DrCeasium/Hyperfactorial array notation: Analysis part 2/@comment-5529393-20130527105642/@comment-7484840-20130530165556

2 small problems:

1: if n![1@] ~ falpha(n), then n![2@] ~ falpha+1(n). Obviously, [1,1,2]w/[1] (with magic ...) >> [2]w/[1] (with magic ...) and so therefore is >> fphi(omega,0)+1.

2: I'm not sure if you reaslise that [1,1,2]w/[1] = [1,[1]w/[1]]w/[1] = [1,[1,1,1,....,1,2]]w/[1]. to be honest, i hadn't really thought much about this until a couple of minutes ago, and thinking about what eould have to happen in chains has just taken this notation from powerful but terrible to really really terrible, but powerful. I will work on an equally powered but better version asap.