User blog comment:Cookiefonster/FGH growth rate stuff/@comment-2033667-20150918193817

@Ikosaract, CF: My views on this have shifted a little bit. I am actually okay with FGH approximations in articles, but with some restrictions which I think are reasonable.

Comparisons should only be done for f_e0 and below, because we haven't agreed on any hierarchy other than the well-defined and standardized Wainer hierarchy.

Terms like "roughly," "estimate," or "approximate" should be used to clarify that the comparison isn't intended to be formal.

Unless there is no better alternative, the approximation should not appear in the infobox and leading paragraph.