User blog comment:B1mb0w/Nested f omega functions/@comment-1605058-20150703155100/@comment-10262436-20150704015158

Hi LittlePeng9 This blog is reworked to align with your comment which I agree with. The blog also corrects 1 error I have found in the "General Rule G1" which I rely upon entirely to justify the D(2,0,n) ordinal progression.

The error was more to do with my proof than my result (so far). The General Rule is trying to equate nested f omega functions to "any" ordinal. So far I found that the proof is not so obvious when we reach w+2 but I believe I have fixed that problem.

The "First Example" above, should be correct. The "Basis for a general rule" above, is (at this time) the same as I asserted for the general rule. I just now need to prove that it works for all ordinals above w+2.

I should be able to work up some of the hierarchy by myself without more errors, but if you want to glance at it and call out any pitfalls, I will appreciate it.

cheers b1mb0w