User blog comment:B1mb0w/The R Function/@comment-25601061-20180311225548/@comment-10262436-20180318072553

Hi. We had a similar comment exchange on my SeT function about 1 year ago, I agreed with you that

"   I see that this is an extension to the S function. But shouldn't S(n,T(1,0),1) ~ fphi(1,1,0)(n)?   "

where T(1,0) = T^T(0) (0) and T(a+1)=S(T(a),T(a),1)

since then I defined a stronger T function in my generalised S function blog and have introduced a new notation system in the R function.

In short r(a+1)=R^r(a) (r(a)_*,r(a)) and so r(2) is stronger than T(1,0)

This blog is not finished. As I add R and r functions with multiple parameters, then I plan to reach LVO

cheers