User blog comment:Sbiis Saibian/Order of the Kasnerites/@comment-3427444-20170113102121/@comment-5982810-20170114183858

The point is, if TREE(3) were a proper googolism an article on it would be practically obligatory. It would not necessarily need to contain a description of the TREE function. It could run along the lines of:


 * googolism* is the name for the number TREE(3). The term was coined by *person*. See TREE function.

Furthermore, if anyone starts naming googolism's based on the TREE function ... what do you think happens ...