User blog comment:Wythagoras/All my stuff/@comment-7484840-20130715121715/@comment-86.182.99.211-20130715155233

@littlePeng: there is another part to the definition which states that if it hasn't levelled off by a certain extremely long time away (this does have an exact value on my site), then Hollom's number takes that value.

@deedlit11: If someone was to define a higher order function then it could just be included in the iota function due to it not having a definite value if it refers to the future. The time argument takes care of higher order functions. Good point about the iota function breaking the gentlemans rule though.