User blog comment:PsiCubed2/Let's Bring this to vote, shall we?/@comment-3427444-20170625080751/@comment-30754445-20170702125720

Is the current Tetroogol article really much better than a stub, though?

Basically it's "Number X was invented by Y", a single sentence describing the origin of the name, and a table of approximations. And there's really not much more we can add to that. What do you expect from an article about a single number?

So the Tetroogol article pretty much serves as a "state-of-the-art" example for an article about a specific googoloism. And there's nothing wrong with having articles like that as *part* of the wiki. But do we really need another 10 thousand such articles?

I think that the thing that drives me crazy here, is this "race" to make as many articles as possible as if this is somehow synonymous to quality. We should concentrate our efforts on organizing the information in better ways.