User blog comment:Billicusp/Uggh/@comment-12.144.5.30-20160112070930/@comment-27173506-20160115152347

@Emlightened Be careful that someone doesn't BAN you ;)

@OP See, the thing is that at scales like this it is sort of similar to "your number times 2". Look at the Aarex function. It's applying Ackermann level recursion to the Xi function, an uncomputable function that eventually dominates all computable functions. That is, if your notation does not refer to any other uncomputable function, no matter how powerful it is, the Xi function is stronger O_o.

Now technically, the Aarex function is stronger. It's not adding one, nor is it a simple factorial, but taking such an incredibly powerful function and recursing it is just... Pointless.

This is quite similar to what you're doing in some places: there's nothing wrong with factorials, but just inserting them all the time... Adding 1 to Graham's Number is almost infinitely more noticeable. I'd advise you to not randomly insert functions which "technically" increase the growth rate, but think about what you put in.