User blog comment:Edwin Shade/What Might Be The Explanation ?/@comment-1605058-20171227225111/@comment-30754445-20171228064637

I think it's more likely that they simply have no idea how Wikia content is licensed at all, and simply flagged the video(s) because it contains materials by other people.

As for CC BY-SA 3.0, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't simply saying "this content is by XYZ" sufficient? And didn't Edwin Shade do exactly this on all of his videos?

Seems like human error. But really, we should thank youtube for being so user-unfriendly, because any excuse to move our stuff to non-googol owned websites is most welcome in my view.

(I must admit, however, that I'm still wondering what is the point of posting hundreds of videos which are nothing more than an out-loud read of googology blog posts. These posts are - usually - really really not audio-friendly. Even if it's to practice some kind of skill (better speech technique? overcoming shyness?) surely there are more suitable texts for this purpose?)