User blog comment:Vel!/Proof of the Riemann hypothesis?/@comment-1605058-20130401075756

Hmm, using a bit of analysis, I found that this proof is either 100% right, or 100% wrong, so same applies to Riemann hypothesis. By using inverse Kolmogorov's zero-one law it means Riemann hypothesis is tail event. If there was counter-example for this hypothesis, given this single (thus finite) piece of information we'd decide invalidity of hypothesis. Thus Riemann hypothesis couldn't be tail event. Contradiction proving there are no counter-examples. Riemann hypothesis proven without using banana lemma!