User blog comment:Billicusp/Uggh/@comment-12.144.5.30-20160112070930/@comment-27173506-20160113155557

Your notation doesn't seem very strong to me. It's kind of hard to analyze (as it isn't defined properly), but since it uses BEAF it reaches f_w^w^w(n) at least (in the fast growing hierarchy). It appears to reach at the absolute maximum f_(w^w^w)2(n), and most definitely isn't the biggest number ever.

Before you rush ahead and define more and bigger numbers, you might want to "clean up" everything a bit. There is no single definition somewhere for all of your notation, it looks quite arbitrary and is hard to read. See for example BAN (which is incredibly larger than anything you mention in your page), or my more easy to understand (in my opinion) question mark notation, which also is stronger.

@Cookiefonster I'm more of a salad person myself.