User blog comment:Alemagno12/Weak BEAF/@comment-24509095-20150724225204

this has actually been done before I'm not sure if you know

I've spotted a few things that are wrong with this:


 * 1) $$\text{WEAK}\{#2(2)3(3)4#\}$$ can evaluate to either $$\text{WEAK}\{#1296#\}$$ or $$\text{WEAK}\{#162#\}$$
 * 2) if you consider that the "Rest of rules apply as normal BEAF", $$\text{WEAK}\{3, 3(2)2\}$$ can evaluate to either $$6$$ or $$9$$
 * 3) $$\text{WEAK}\{n\}$$ is equal to $$\text{WEAK}\{n, 1\}$$, right? (you know what this means)

and probably many more