User blog comment:Syst3ms/YAUD/@comment-30754445-20180810132619/@comment-30754445-20180812001605

@Syst3ms

Oops... sorry, but I missed this part:

"To address the main point, fixing the "problems" you're talking about is far, FAR easier than actually defining it as an OCF. Why I'm not explicitly calling the objects of this system "ordinals" is because actual ordinals give me constraints under which the only way to formally define UNOCF is to use an actual OCF, which this attempt is precisely NOT trying to do. It would restrict a lot of my freedom of definition."

I fail to see how explicity calling these objects "ordinals" would restrict you in any way. Can you give an example of such a restriction?