User blog comment:Primussupremus/Another attempt at defining some type of notation./@comment-24920136-20170419054217/@comment-30754445-20170419101651

Chrono: At least he's trying to do actual googology this time. It's actually a decent idea (not very strong, just a bunch of recursions laid one upon another, but we got to start from somewhere). The presentation, though, is horrible. I'll give you that.

Prim: Since your haven't properly defined most of your steps, that last number is undefined.

Being generous, I'll say that the largest thing you've defined here is {a(b)c # d}. But even that is debateble, because giving examples is not the same as properly defining something.

Beyond that, it isn't clear at all how things expand. I could fill in the blanks in a reasonable way if I wanted to, but then it would my notation and not yours.

Oh, and if you want people to actually read what you post, I suggest you put more effort in making your posts readable. Nobody is going to waste their time on a dense wall of text with dozens of lines.