Talk:Toogolduduex

This appears to be a mistake on Username5243's site. The relevent part of the list of number names reads:


 * (298) Toogolplexiduex = 10[2]10[1]10[3]100
 * (299) Toogolduexiplex = 10[1]10[2]10[3]100
 * (300) Toogolduduex = 10[3]10[3]100

It appears that the definition intended was 10[2]10[2]10[3]100, not 10[3]10[3]100. As a result of this mistake, this article is currently a redirect to gaggolplex. Should we fix it? -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 07:58, February 2, 2017 (UTC)