User blog comment:Vel!/Ordinals and arrow notation/@comment-3427444-20140217134909

Revitalizing the "duel of archery": On Sbiis Saibian's Extended Cascading-E Notation article, Saibian said that the climbing method suggested at Bowers' suggests that X^^(X+1) corresponds to e_1, which is quite different from what we thought. Do you think that is correct?