Talk:Giaquaxul

Approximations
Actually the array [1,1,1,200] is equvalent to \(\omega^{\omega^{\omega^{...\omega+1...}+1}}\) with 200 \(\omega\)'s and 198 +1's, at the breaking point of Wainer hierarchy, and [1,1,1,1,2] is equvalent to \(\varepsilon_0\). Numbers from giaquaxul to trigrand giaquaxul are difficult to make approximations to other notations because the notations will be very long and hard to read if we make it more exact. Surely we can say: numbers from giaquaxul to trigrand giaquaxul are approximately \(f_{\varepsilon_0}(200)\), but that's much rougher. It make no sense to do that, so I'm about to delete all the approximations from giaquaxul to trigrand giaquaxul. hyp$hyp?cos&#38;cos (talk) 12:01, November 20, 2013 (UTC)