User blog comment:DrCeasium/Hyperfactorial array notation: Analysis part 2/@comment-5529393-20130527105642/@comment-5529393-20130530141921

Say what? The ... is still there, but it is replaced with m's? When you replace the ... with m's, and reduce the notation, the array values change, so we don't get a repeat of the same number. So you get something like [1,4,3,2.3,6,8], but you say there is still a ... in there? Where is it? I really wouldn't advise this present but not present ..., but anyway, please explain.

Also, your rule does not reduce the number of w/'s. I thought it reduced the number of ...'s but apparently they are still there, so they are not reduced either. So the rule does not terminate.