User blog comment:Tetramur/Possible explanations to tetrational arrays on BEAF/@comment-39541634-20190908000507

You seem to be vastly underestimating the power of BEAF arrays. When you say things like "we raise 100^100^100 into 100^100th degree" it seems like you are confusing the BEAF structure of A & n with the ordinary number A.

Either that, or you're knowingly skipping so many intermediate steps that it becomes impossible to answer your question of "do I underestand this correctly". Since you've limited your discussion only to expressions of the form f(X) & 10, you are only dealing with the complexity of f(X) itself (which is a tetrational number) rather than the complexity of the BEAF array it generates (which is a tetrational array). These are, like, two completely different conceptual levels.

To paraphrase Chronolegends: You've yadda yadda'd the most important part. :-)