User blog comment:Ubersketch/A proposal for a standard/@comment-35470197-20190811012241

I disagree. Since Deedlit ignored the credit for Rathjen, KOCF was considered by many googologists as his original contribution. At least, its portion based on weakly Mahlo cardinal is just Rathjen's non-standard OCF except the position of indices, accordng to Deedlit's confession. Although I am not certain whether he intensionally hid the credit or just was forgetting it throughout his activity, recreations without appropriate credits to the original contributions should not be considered as standard ones.

In addition, you seem to comfound "Cantor's normal form". Maybe you are talking about the (pssibly non-normal) notation used in Wainer hierarchy. Moreover, your blog post is not an appropriate link, because you personally arranged it in order to fit your convention, which is ill-defined as I explained in the comment. Therefore it should not be considered as standard one. If you seriously consider such topics, quote sources which are sufficiently reliable.