User blog comment:DrCeasium/new hyperfactorial array notation/@comment-5150073-20130415141127/@comment-7484840-20130416193710

Thanks, I thought that {b,p(1)2} would have been a 2D array of first row {b,p} and second row {2}, (which is still right), but I didn't notice the extra rule abut this situation because  the part that said this was under " Extending Array Notation", which I thought didn't apply to BEAF (well I know now). I f this rule didn't apply, I would have been right. The only (very small) problem with this is that it does exist, and apply, and therefore, all of this stuff I have been saying about arrays in BEAF does not take into account this rule, and is therefore incorrect. This doesn't affect any of my notation though