User blog comment:Vel!/FGH Gripe/@comment-30754445-20170220134751/@comment-24920136-20170220172132

I agree with the sentiment on both sides of this, here is my proposed solution:

claims of that nature be *ONLY* treated as wiki canon (ie: allowed in main space) if

a: the author provides a description or reference/link to one of the fundamental sequences for the ordinal notations included in his claim. This would be beneficial in two ways, first it would dissipate some doubt and uncertainty, and secondly it would eventually lead to the rise of a standard, since people will rather link to an acceptable source than re-do all the work.

b: also provides a supporting argument for the comparison. for example: "entry = f_alpha(x) is demonstrated by Y". Because otherwise fgh becomes a sort of buzzword