User blog comment:Superman37891/Request for a new rule/@comment-30754445-20170605000835

As I've already explained on your Talk page, people weren't doing that on your blog.

The responses you got had absolutely nothing to do with "competition". We were trying to make the point, that's it pointless to mix something as huge as Rayo's Number with far weaker functions like up-arrows, because the arrows don't make any noticable difference in the final size of the number.

Let me try this again:

Rayo's Number is defined as Rayo(10100).

One of your numbers was defined like this:

"{(999 Rayo's number tetriated with 999 Rayo's number arrows to 999 Rayo's number), (999 Rayo's number tetriated with 999 Rayo's number arrows to 999 Rayo's number), (999 Rayo's number tetriated with 999 Rayo's number arrows to 999 Rayo's number)}"

Now, when I told you that Rayo(10100+1) is bigger than that number, that's not me boasting my googology fu or trying to compete with you. I mean, seriously, all I did was add 1! The point of my comment was that Rayo itself is so strong, that trying to "enhance" is with tetrations and arrows and arrays is futile.