Category talk:3 entry linear

Proposal about re-categorization
I think this category should only contain numbers that are defined using up-arrow notation, or 3-entry linear array notation. This includes numbers which are too small to be called 'up-arrow notation level'

And make a new category, called Category:Up-arrow notation level, contains numbers which are on the Up-arrow notation level.

Examples:
 * Tripent belongs on both Category:3 entry linear and Category:Up-arrow notation level.
 * Tritet Jr. belongs on Category:3 entry linear, but not on Category:Up-arrow notation level.
 * Ginorgol doesn't belong on Category:3 entry linear, but belongs on Category:Up-arrow notation level.

Also, do the same thing on Category:4 entry linear, creating Category:Chained arrow notation level, as well as the categories for larger arrays.

How was that? -- I want more clouds! 02:10, May 6, 2013 (UTC)